Tiotropium's cost-effectiveness for the treatment of COPD: a cost-utility analysis under real-world conditions
© Neyt et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 14 July 2009
Accepted: 15 September 2010
Published: 15 September 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Jul 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Nov 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lotte Steuten|
|24 Nov 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martine Hoogendoorn|
|2 Dec 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nikos Maniadakis|
|6 Jan 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Mattias Neyt|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Jan 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Feb 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nikos Maniadakis|
|16 Mar 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Huib Kerstjens|
|24 Mar 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Reijo Sund|
|16 Apr 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Mattias Neyt|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Apr 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Sep 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Mattias Neyt|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|7 Sep 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Sep 2010||Editorially accepted|
|15 Sep 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2466-10-47|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.