A systematic review with attempted network meta-analysis of asthma therapy recommended for five to eighteen year olds in GINA steps three and four
© van der Mark et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 28 November 2011
Accepted: 20 September 2012
Published: 15 October 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Nov 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elias Zintzaras|
|4 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Leonello Fuso|
|26 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Lonneke van der Mark|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Leonello Fuso|
|2 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elias Zintzaras|
|26 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Kalbfleisch|
|18 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Lonneke van der Mark|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|18 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|20 Sep 2012||Editorially accepted|
|15 Oct 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2466-12-63|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.