A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oral montelukast in acute asthma exacerbation
© Zubairi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 8 August 2012
Accepted: 15 March 2013
Published: 28 March 2013
Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) are well established in the management of outpatient asthma. However, there is very little information as to their role in acute asthma exacerbations. We hypothesized that LTRAs may accelerate lung function recovery when given in an acute exacerbation.
A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital to assess the efficacy of oral montelukast on patients of 16 years of age and above who were hospitalized with acute asthma exacerbation. The patients were given either montelukast or placebo along with standard therapy throughout the hospital stay for acute asthma. Improvements in lung function and duration of hospital stay were monitored.
100 patients were randomized; their mean age was 52 years (SD +/− 18.50). The majority were females (79%) and non-smokers (89%). The mean hospital stay was 3.70 ± 1.93 days with 80% of patients discharged in 3 days. There was no significant difference in clinical symptoms, PEF over the course of hospital stay (p = 0.20 at day 2 and p = 0.47 at day 3) and discharge (p = 0.15), FEV1 at discharge (p = 0.29) or length of hospital stay (p = 0.90) between the two groups. No serious adverse effects were noted during the course of the study.
Our study suggests that there is no benefit of addition of oral montelukast over conventional treatment in the management of acute asthma attack.
Trial registration number: 375-Med/ERC-04
KeywordsAsthma attack Leukotriene receptor antagonist Montelukast PEF FEV1
Acute asthma accounts for nearly 2 million emergency department visits and 500,000 admissions each year in the US, frequently ranking as a major contributor to time away from work and decreased productivity . Its incidence is on the rise all across the world, especially in the pediatric population, with bronchial asthma accounting for 4% of the pediatric out-patient visits [2, 3]. A multi-country survey has demonstrated a rise in asthma symptoms from 8.5% to 11.7% in 13–14 year old Pakistani children, over a 6 year period .
Asthma is associated with chronic airway inflammation with recruitment of a number of inflammatory cells including T-cells, mast cells and eosinophils. The macrophages, eosinophils and mast cells in particular have the capacity to synthesize cysteinyl leukotrienes. The interaction of these mediators with the Type 1 cysteinyl leukotriene (CysLT) receptors, located on inflammatory cells and the structural cells of the airways, is implicated in inflammatory cell infiltration, initiation of bronchial smooth muscle contraction, mucus secretion and increased vascular permeability that ultimately leads to airway narrowing .
Montelukast is the most commonly used cysteinyl leukotrienes receptor 1 (CysLT-1) antagonist. It has been shown to improve symptoms and lung function (FEV1) within 15 minutes of administration in chronic asthma with its effects lasting for a period of at least 24 hours .
The existing therapeutic modalities for acute asthma include oxygen and short acting β2 agonist bronchodilators in order to promptly reverse airflow obstruction . The systemic corticosteroids are recommended for exacerbations that are unresponsive to initial therapeutic measures but studies have shown a 4–6 hour delay in the onset of the effects of steroid therapy . Such a delay can prove to be catastrophic in the 30% of patients who fail to respond to initial therapy by short acting β2-agonists . Furthermore, an increased rate of relapse following an acute exacerbation persists even with corticosteroid therapy [10, 11] with an estimated 10% rate of relapse within 7 days of discharge from the emergency room (ER) and a 31% recurrence rate 10 to 21 days after discharge [12–15].
In our study, we tested the hypothesis that treatment with a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA), montelukast sodium would improve airway obstruction and clinical outcomes in acute asthma exacerbation and would subsequently decrease the duration of hospital stay.
The patients were identified from the Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH), located in Karachi, the largest metropolitan city of Pakistan. This is a 650-bed, internationally accredited tertiary care hospital that caters to the needs of a large multi-ethnic urban population. The hospital has a dedicated emergency room (ER) and a 5-bed respiratory special care unit staffed by a team of physicians and nurses trained in the management of respiratory disorders.
All patients of age 16 and above who presented to the AKUH with acute asthma exacerbation were screened for enrollment in the study. Informed consent was obtained. The eligibility criteria included a diagnosis of acute asthma exacerbation that required hospitalization as defined by the Global Initiative for National Asthma (GINA) Guidelines . The criteria for hospitalization was FEV1 < 70% predicted or PEF < 300 L/min after 30 minutes of receiving initial treatment in the ER, respiratory rate > 24 breaths/min and no improvement in symptoms such as shortness of breath or wheezing.
This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled parallel group drug trial conducted over a period of two years from February 2006 to February 2008. All patients presenting either to the emergency department or outpatient clinics of the AKUH requiring hospitalization with acute asthma exacerbation were screened for inclusion in the study. The study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee (ERC) of the Aga Khan University (375-Med/ERC-04). A written informed consent was obtained before enrollment and findings were shared with subjects interested in the study outcome on clinic follow-up. The patients underwent a baseline spirometry and peak expiratory flow (PEF) testing soon after enrollment. A brief questionnaire was used to obtain information about the duration, severity and treatment of asthma.
The bedside spirometry was done using PiKo-1 (ATS and EU electronic peak flow monitor, Ferraris Respiratory Europe Ltd., Westford SG13 7NW, UK) software which measures the PEF and FEV1. The PiKo-1 test was repeated three times. The primary aim of utilizing the software was to facilitate both patient and investigator use. Each test was performed within three minutes of the previous one. The spirometry was done on admission and discharge. Other investigations like chest radiographs and arterial blood gases (ABG’s) were done if deemed necessary by the admitting team.
A group sample size of 50 patients in treatment (Montelukast) and 50 in placebo group achieved 80% power to detect a mean difference of 0.3 liters between the two groups with a mean of 2.2  and standard deviation of 0.7 at 5% significance level using a two-sided two-sample t-test. The required final target sample size was 100 patients.
Randomization and blinding
The AKUH pharmacy played a pivotal role in the randomization of patients. The trial coordinator at the AKUH pharmacy was the key person to maintain randomization and blinding and was the only one to know the treatment status of the patient. Allocation numbers were generated and assigned to each patient found eligible to be enrolled in the study. Patients were distributed to each arm based on the allocated code. Neither the evaluators, nor the on-call admitting team were made aware of the actual treatment allocations.
The patients were randomly allocated to one of the two study arms; patients in arm-1 received standard therapy and oral montelukast sodium (10 mg once daily) and those in arm-2 received standard therapy along with a placebo.
Additional asthma therapies with aminophylline and magnesium sulphate were given on the discretion of the admitting team when asthma exacerbation was not responding to initial standard therapy after hospitalization. Antibiotics were given only if there was clinical or radiological suspicion of bacterial infection like fever >101 °F, purulent sputum production or clinical or radiological signs of consolidation. The use of antibiotic was not assessed in our study.
Patients in the treatment arm 1 received oral montelukast 10 mg first dose in the ER followed by 10 mg oral dose once a day in evening for the duration of stay in the hospital. The medication was started in the ER as soon as standard therapy was administered, informed consent was obtained and a decision was made for hospitalization.
The placebo was of the same appearance (color and size) and taste as the trial medication; it was prepared by the Hilton Pharma after being approved by Ministry of Health (MoH) Pakistan. The first dose was given in the ER followed by once daily for a period of duration of stay in the hospital. The trial coordinator in AKUH pharmacy managed the storage and distribution of placebo. The serial peak expiratory flow (PEF) monitoring was done; a baseline PEF value was obtained on enrolment, then at 30, 60 and 90 minutes from the baseline value, followed by every 12 hours daily until discharge. A minimum of 3 readings were obtained each time before administration of bronchodilator and the best of 3 was taken as the final value.
The primary outcomes of the study were a) improvement in lung function measured as PEF and FEV1 over the course of hospital stay and discharge and b) duration of hospital stay.
Secondary outcome included development of complications such as respiratory failure, cardiac arrest and/or death.
For descriptive analysis mean ± standard deviation are reported for continuous variables, and number (%) for categorical variables. In univariate analyses, differences in proportions for type of treatment groups were assessed by using the Chi-square test or Fisher exact test where appropriate. For contrasts of continuous variables, independent sample t-test was used to assess the difference of means. All analyses were conducted by using the Statistical package for social science (SPSS Release 15.0, standard version, copyright © SPSS; 1989–02), p-values were two sided and considered as statistically significant if < 0.05.
Baseline characteristics of study patients receiving montelukast and placebo (n = 100)
Age in years (SD)
50.50 ± 18.26
52.68 ± 18.86
Male: Female (n)
a. Past history of sudden severe exacerbations
b. > 2 admissions
c. ICU admissions
d. Prior intubation
Family history of Asthma
a) Fluticasone 250 mcg + Salmeterol 25 mcg
b) Oral Theophylline
c) Inhaled anti-cholinergic
b) Weather change
c) Non-compliance to drugs
d) Allergen exposure
b) Current smoker
a) IV aminophylline
b) IV magnesium sulphate
c) Oral theophylline
Primary outcome measures
Peak expiratory flow (PEF) & forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ) in patients receiving montelukast vs. placebo
PEF at admission
PEF at day 2
149.48 ± 75.76
173.41 ± 103
PEF at day3
183.35 ± 113.12
PEF at discharge
FEV1 at admission
FEV1 at discharge
There was no significant variation in the duration of hospital stay between both the groups with the mean duration for patients belonging to montelukast and placebo groups being 3.67 ± 1.86 days and 3.72 ± 2.02 days, respectively (p = 0.90).
Secondary outcome measures
Two patients, one from each arm, developed respiratory failure. No patient in either group was withdrawn due to worsening asthma or adverse drug effect from the study.
Our study did not reveal significant differences in pulmonary function tests measured as FEV1 at admission and discharge and PEF measured at specific intervals or length of hospital stay in patients hospitalized with acute asthma exacerbation that were given oral montelukast vs. placebo. The efficacy and tolerability profile of oral montelukast were comparable to placebo and no serious adverse effects were encountered.
The pathology of asthma triggers the arachnoid acid cascade leading to formation of leukotrienes via the 5-lipoxygenase pathway. The cysteinyl leukotrienes possess pro-inflammatory characteristics which can directly cause or potentiate airflow obstruction by increased mucosal secretion and bronchospasm [5, 17]. Leukotriene pathway modifiers, hence, are a subject of interest as a possible adjunct therapy in the acute management of asthma exacerbation. However, our results are in contrast to data recently published by Ramsay et al. They randomized 73 patients and found a significantly higher peak expiratory flows (PEFs) measured in the morning after admission in patients who received montelukast (p = 0.046, 95% CI of 1.15-113.6 L/min) as compared to patients who did not . A study by Silverman et al. evaluated the effects of another LTRA, zafirlukast. They randomized patients into three groups; oral zafirlukast at 20 mg and 160 mg vs. placebo. They looked at the time to relapse in the outpatient setting after discharge from the emergency department and found reduction in the absolute rate of relapse by 5.3% in patients treated with zafirlukast. They reported significant improvement in FEV1 and dyspnea in the ER only with 160 mg of zafirlukast . Other studies have also looked into effects of intravenous montelukast in managing acute asthma exacerbations. Camargo et al. randomized 201 patients to three groups with two receiving separate doses of montelukast (7 mg and 14 mg) and one group receiving placebo. They reported significantly higher FEV1 in patients receiving standard therapy with montelukast as compared to placebo at 10 minutes (p = 0.03), 20 minutes (p = 0.007) and two hours (p = 0.003) . These results were validated in a more recent study in Japan which reported both IV monteleukast 7 mg and 14 mg to be effective as an adjunct therapy over 60 minutes; p < 0.05 and p < 0.001 respectively .
To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first one to report no added benefits of using montelukast in acute asthma exacerbation in hospitalized adult population. Other studies which report similar findings mostly correspond to the pediatric population [22–24]. Nelson et al.  and Morris et al.  did not find any significant increase in FEV1 by using oral and intravenous montelukast respectively while Todi et al. reported similar proportion of children having Modified Pulmonary Index Score ≤ 9 in both the study and control groups .
A possible reason we failed to find significant improvement is that we looked at PEFs early in the course of hospitalization instead of FEV1 in comparison to the positive studies cited above. Another reason for failure of significant improvement might be the use of enteral route of administration. However, Dockhorn et al. conducted a study comparing the effectiveness of intravenous montelukast vs. oral montelukast vs. placebo in the setting of acute asthma. Though intravenous montelukast was quicker in onset of action with the mean percentage change in FEV1 higher at earlier time intervals (15 mins to 1 hour), this difference decreased over the time and was not significant (p > 0.05). Moreover, there was no difference in mean maximum percentage change in FEV1 from baseline between intravenous and oral montelukast (p = 0.071) .
This study has several limitations. Firstly, our study sample is relatively small. Secondly, we excluded patients with respiratory failure requiring positive pressure ventilation, either noninvasive or invasive. Both these factors may have impacted on the strength of difference observed in the two groups. Another limitation is the lack of biological surrogate markers like cysteinyl leukotrienes levels which have been shown to be higher in states of acute asthma exacerbation . It is possible that these levels may have reduced in the patients but did not translate into clinical effectiveness yet. The use of Piko-1 pocket spirometer is another limitation in our study. A study from Switzerland revealed that the accuracy of Piko-1 spirometer is acceptable. However, it tended to underestimate FEV1 in the lower range in 20 volunteers . Lastly, this was a single center study and hence, cannot be generalized to the whole population.
Our study suggests that there is no added benefit of using montelukast along with the standard therapy for the management of acute asthma exacerbation in hospitalized adult population. We recommend that larger scale multicenter trials would better help to evaluate the role of cysteinyl leukotrienes antagonists in treating acute exacerbations of asthma.
Leukotriene receptor antagonists
Peak expiratory flow
Forced expiratory volume in 1 second
Aga Khan University Hospital
We are thankful to the research officers; Dr. Shahan Waheed and Dr. Kiran Afshan for data collection and data entry. We are also thankful to the patients and their families who consented to participate in our trial.
We acknowledge the support provided by Hilton Pharma (Pvt.) Limited for the preparation of placebo, provision of study medication, portable spiromter and financial assistance for the payment of salary to research officers. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
- Mannino DM, Homa DM, Akinbami LJ, Moorman JE, Gwynn C, Redd SC: Surveillance for asthma: United States, 1980–1999. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2002, 51: 1-13.Google Scholar
- Hazir T, Das C, Piracha F, Waheed B, Azam MI: Carers’ perception of childhood asthma and its management in a selected Pakistani community. Arch Dis Chil. 2002, 87: 287-290.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Khan MA, Hazir T: Management of bronchial asthma in children. J Pak Med Assoc. 1995, 45: 46-50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Asher MI, Montefort S, Björkstén B, Lai CK, Strachan DP, Weiland SK, Williams H, ISAAC Phase Three Study Group: Worldwide time trends in the prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and eczema in childhood: ISAAC phases one and three repeat multicountry cross-sectional surveys. Lancet. 2006, 368: 733-743.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peters-Golden M, Henderson WR: Leukotrienes. N Engl J Med. 2007, 357: 1841-1854.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dockhorn RJ, Baumgartner RA, Leff JA, Noonan M, Vandormael K, Stricker W, Weinland DE, Reiss TF: Comparison of the effects of intravenous and oral montelukast on airway function: a double blind, placebo controlled, three period, crossover study in asthmatic patients. Thorax. 2000, 55: 260-265.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Global Initiative for Asthma: Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. Updated. 2010, http://www.ginasthma.org/Guidelines/guidelines-resources.html,Google Scholar
- Rowe BH, Spooner C, Ducharme FM, Bretzlaff JA, Bota GW: Early emergency department treatment of acute asthma with systemic corticosteroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001, 1: CD002178Google Scholar
- Strauss L, Hejal R, Galan G, Dixon L, McFadden ER: Observations on the effects of aerosolized albuterol in acute asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997, 155: 454-458.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- National Asthma Education and Prevention Program: Expert panel report II: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. 1997, Bethesda, MD: National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, NIH Publication No. 97–4051Google Scholar
- National Institutes of Health: Global initiative for asthma: global strategy for asthma management and prevention: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/World Health Organization Workshop Report. 1995, Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, NIH Publication No. 95–3659Google Scholar
- Kelsen SG, Kelsen DP, Fleeger BF, Jones RC, Rodman T: Emergency room assessment and treatment of patients with acute asthma: adequacy of the conventional approach. Am J Med. 1978, 64: 622-628.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ducharme FM, Kramer MS: Relapse following emergency treatment for acute asthma: can it be predicted or prevented?. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993, 46: 1395-1402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Emerman CL, Cydulka RK: Factors associated with relapse after emergency department treatment for acute asthma. Ann Emerg Med. 1995, 26: 6-11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Emerman CL, Woodruff PG, Cydulka RK, Gibbs MA, Pollack CV, Camargo CA: Prospective multicenter study of relapse following treatment for acute asthma among adults presenting to the emergency department. MARC investigators. Multicenter asthma research collaboration. Chest. 1999, 115: 919-927.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Malmstrom K, Rodriguez-Gomez G, Guerra J, Villaran C, Piñeiro A, Wei LX, Seidenberg BC, Reiss TF: Oral montelukast, inhaled beclomethasone, and placebo for chronic asthma. A randomized, controlled trial. Montelukast/beclomethasone study group. Ann Intern Med. 1999, 130 (6): 487-495.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arm JP, Lee TH: Chemical mediators: Leukotrienes and eicosanoids. Bronchial asthma: mechanisms and therapeutics. Edited by: Weiss EB, Stein M. 1993, Boston: Little Brown, 112-134.Google Scholar
- Ramsay CF, Pearson D, Mildenhall S, Wilson AM: Oral montelukast in acute asthma exacerbations: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Thorax. 2011, 66: 7-11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Silverman RA, Nowak RM, Korenblat PE, Skobeloff E, Chen Y, Bonuccelli CM, Miller CJ, Simonson SG: Zafirlukast treatment for acute asthma: evaluation in a randomised, double-blind, multicenter trial. Chest. 2004, 126: 1480-1489.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Camargo CA, Smithline HA, Malice MP, Green SA, Reiss TF: A randomized controlled trial of intravenous montelukast in acute asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003, 167: 528-533.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Adachi M, Taniguchi H, Tohda Y, Sano Y, Ishine T, Smugar SS, Hisada S: The efficacy and tolerability of intravenous montelukast in acute asthma exacerbations in Japanese patients. J Asthma. 2012, 49: 649-656.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nelson KA, Smith SR, Trinkaus K, Jaffe DM: Pilot study of oral montelukast added to standard therapy for acute asthma exacerbations in children aged 6 to 14 years. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008, 24: 21-27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morris CR, Becker AB, Piñieiro A, Massaad R, Green SA, Smugar SS, Gurner DM: A randomized, placebo-controlled study of intravenous montelukast in children with acute asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010, 104: 161-171.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Todi VK, Lodha R, Kabra SK: Effect of addition of single dose of oral montelukast to standard treatment in acute moderate to severe asthma in children between 5 and 15 years of age: a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Arch Dis Child. 2010, 95: 540-543.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Green SA, Malice MP, Tanaka W, Tozzi CA, Reiss TF: Increase in urinary leukotriene LTE4 levels in acute asthma: correlation with airflow limitation. Thorax. 2004, 59: 100-104.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rothe T, Karrer W, Schindler C: Accuracy of the piko-1 pocket spirometer. J Asthma. 2012, 49: 45-50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/13/20/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.