Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Impact of air pollution on respiratory diseases in children with recurrent wheezing or asthma

  • Susanna Esposito1Email author,
  • Carlotta Galeone2,
  • Mara Lelii1,
  • Benedetta Longhi1,
  • Beatrice Ascolese1,
  • Laura Senatore1,
  • Elisabetta Prada1,
  • Valentina Montinaro1,
  • Stefano Malerba3,
  • Maria Francesca Patria1 and
  • Nicola Principi1
BMC Pulmonary Medicine201414:130

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2466-14-130

Received: 16 April 2014

Accepted: 29 July 2014

Published: 7 August 2014

Abstract

Background

Air pollution has many negative health effects on the general population, especially children, subjects with underlying chronic disease and the elderly. The aims of this study were to evaluate the effects of traffic-related pollution on the exacerbation of asthma and development of respiratory infections in Italian children suffering from asthma or wheezing compared with healthy subjects and to estimate the association between incremental increases in principal pollutants and the incidence of respiratory symptoms.

Methods

This prospective study enrolled 777 children aged 2 to 18 years (375 with recurrent wheezing or asthma and 402 healthy subjects). Over 12 months, parents filled out a daily clinical diary to report information about respiratory symptoms, type of medication used and healthcare utilization. Clinical data were combined with the results obtained using an air pollution monitoring system of the five most common pollutants.

Results

Among the 329 children with recurrent wheezing or asthma and 364 healthy subjects who completed follow-up, children with recurrent wheezing or asthma reported significantly more days of fever (p = 0.005) and cough (p < 0.001), episodes of rhinitis (p = 0.04) and tracheitis (p = 0.01), asthma attacks (p < 0.001), episodes of pneumonia (p < 0.001) and hospitalizations (p = 0.02). In the wheezing/asthma cohort, living close to the street with a high traffic density was a risk factor for asthma exacerbations (odds ratio [OR] = 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-2.84), whereas living near green areas was found to be protective (OR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.31 -0.80). An increase of 10 μg/m3 of particulates less than 10 microns in diameter (PM10) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) increased the onset of pneumonia only in wheezing/asthmatic children (continuous rate ratio [RR] = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.00-1.17 for PM10; continuous RR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.01-1.17 for NO2).

Conclusions

There is a significant association between traffic-related pollution and the development of asthma exacerbations and respiratory infections in children born to atopic parents and in those suffering from recurrent wheezing or asthma. These findings suggest that environmental control may be crucial for respiratory health in children with underlying respiratory disease.

Keywords

Air pollution Asthma NO2 PM10 Respiratory disease Traffic-related pollutant Wheezing

Background

Air pollution is a major public health threat, particularly in urban areas with high traffic [13]. Current scientific evidence has demonstrated a potential association between urban air pollutants and adverse health effects, particularly those that affect the respiratory and cardio-vascular systems [4, 5]. Children, the elderly and subjects suffering from chronic disease are particularly vulnerable groups [68]. However, the vulnerability of children is unique, particularly very young children. First, because the lungs of a child are still growing and early exposure to environmental pollutants can easily alter lung development and function; second, children, particularly the preschoolers, are considerably more physically active than all categories of teenagers and adults [9] with longer periods of increased breathing rate that could lead to the deposition of large amounts of environmental pollutants in the respiratory tract; third, young children are predominantly oral breathers, which means that the nasal filter is by-passed, permitting the entry of a large number and variety of pollutants into the lower airways [3].

In children, exposure to traffic-related pollutants has been linked to cough, wheezing, asthma and impaired lung function [3, 1014]; however, it remains unclear whether these effects occur in the whole pediatric population or only in children who are predisposed to or are already suffering from recurrent or chronic respiratory disease. Moreover, it is not clear whether exposure to air pollution influences the risk of more frequent and/or more severe respiratory infections in the pediatric population [15, 16]. To investigate the questions, the objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of traffic-related pollution on the development of asthma exacerbations and respiratory infections in a population of Italian children with a history of recurrent wheezing or asthma compared to healthy controls. We also estimated the association between incremental increases in principal pollutants and the incidence of respiratory symptoms over a 12-month period in both study groups.

Methods

In this prospective study, 777 children aged 2 to 18 years from the Pediatric Clinic of the Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico in Milan, Italy, were enrolled in the study between November and December 2011. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, and the study was conducted in accordance with the standards of Good Clinical Practice. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents or legal guardians of each enrolled child, and written assent was obtained from children older than 7 years.

The study was based on two cohorts of children. The first cohort included 375 children followed at the Respiratory Disease Section of the Pediatric Clinic and was represented by all of those with a history of recurrent wheezing or asthma for whom personal and/or parents’ assent to participate to the study was obtained. Eligibility for recruitment was based on the occurrence in the medical history of at least three pediatrician-diagnosed lower respiratory tract illnesses with wheezing in a 6-month period or pediatrician-diagnosed asthma. Asthma was defined as the presence of episodes of cough, breathlessness or dyspnea together with demonstration of airflow variability (i.e., an increase in the forced expiratory volume in one second of 12% following inhalation of 400 μg salbutamol) [17]. The second cohort comprised 402 healthy children born at term. with no history of chronic underlying disease and with no history of wheezing/asthma, negative for the presence of lower respiratory tract disease at baseline, who were randomly selected and enrolled in the study during the same period among those who attended the Outpatient Clinic for minor surgery procedures.

At the time of recruitment, parents of the children in both cohorts received information orally regarding the purposes of the project and the family commitments. After signing the informed consent form, standardized, self-administered questionnaires, completed by the parents, were used to collect information about the characteristics of the family (i.e., parental education, parental smoking, family history of atopy), clinical data regarding the child (including characteristics at birth, neonatal respiratory or cardiac diseases, duration of breastfeeding, previous hospitalizations) and the characteristics of the home environment (i.e., home type and size, location and characteristics, proximity to green areas, polluted areas or high traffic roads, exposure to passive smoke). Residence in a “green area” was defined as a home within 300 m of a park. On the contrary, home sited in polluted areas or areas with high traffic were considered those homes not sited in a residential area or far no more than 500 m from a factory, a highway or an urban expressway. The questionnaire that required 10 minutes to complete was conceived by the first author (SE) in collaboration with the co-authors (CG and MFP) and pilot tested on a sample of 20 children.

The parents completed a daily clinical diary over a period of 12 months beginning in January 2012, reporting information about the type and frequency of respiratory diseases, types of medications used and healthcare utilization. Diagnosis of asthma attack was made when, in a subjects without respiratory symptoms, cough, breathlessness or dyspnea together with pediatrician-documented airflow variability suddenly occurred. To avoid recall bias, the compliance of each family was checked weekly via a telephone call. A clinical follow-up was performed approximately every two months for the whole study population.

Clinical data were combined with information collected from the air pollution monitoring system. Daily information on the concentrations of the two most common pollutants (nitrogen dioxide [NO2] and particulates less than 10 microns in diameter [PM10]) in the municipalities of Lombardy were obtained from the air quality monitoring stations managed by the Regional Environmental Protection Agency (REPA) of Lombardia (located in different points of the city of Milan and its hinterland). The number of stations for monitoring air pollutants were eight for Milan and seven for the hinterland. The methods and technologies used to measure air concentrations were those designated at national and international level. In particular, for particulate matter, PM10 were currently obtained using beta-ray attenuation monitors and corrected TEOM (Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance). The REPA determined correction factors for particulate matter levels based on gravimetric and TEOM measure comparison. The parallel geometric instruments were placed in different sites and for different period during the year; the correction factors have been verified retrospectively and subsequently applied [18]. A modeling system was applied by REPA to compute the spatial distribution of air pollutants [19], and in our analyses we used data on air pollutants at a municipality–level. A selection of meteorological parameters, including temperature (daily average, minimum and maximum), relative humidity, precipitation and wind speed were also collected for adjustment. There were no day missing from the air pollution data during the study.

Comparisons between children with wheezing or asthma and healthy children were performed by contingency table analysis with the χ 2 test for categorical variables or Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test (for data that were not normally distributed based on the Shapiro-Wilk test) for continuous variables. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to measure the association between various indices of air pollution exposure and the occurrence of asthma in the group of children with wheezing/asthma. The ORs were computed using unconditional multiple logistic regression models that included terms for age, sex, number of siblings, parental education and presence of smokers at home. The association between air pollutants and episodes of lower respiratory tract infections was quantified using multivariate regression models based on the generalized estimating equations [19] to adjust for within-subject correlations due to repeated measurements in the responses. We fitted the generalized longitudinal models using the logit link and binomial errors with the GENMOD procedure in SAS.

The levels of air pollutant exposure were calculated as 3-day means (lag 0–2) of the daily weighted average PM10 and the maximum daily NO2 level in each subject’s municipality of residence. These levels were introduced in the models either as categorical variables (i.e., categories were defined a priori, for PM10 on the basis of air quality standards defined by the European Commission, that established a 24-hour average health based maximum level of 50 μg/m3; and for NO2 on the basis of tertiles of exposure) or continuous variables (i.e., results represent the increase or decrease in risk corresponding to an increment of 10 μg/m3 in the level of the pollutant considered). Other time-dependent covariates that were included in the multivariate analyses were temperature (3-day means), relative humidity (3-day means), day of the week, and season. Invariant covariates were sex, age at enrolment, parental education, number of siblings at enrollment and presence of smokers at home.

We computed the ORs and corresponding 95% CI for the recurrent wheezing/asthma and healthy subjects adjusting for the above variables. Because the probability of a lower respiratory tract infection was low for a given child on a given day of the study period, the OR represents a satisfactory approximation of the rate ratio (RR).

All the analyses were two-tailed, and p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All of the analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.2 (Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Of the 777 children who were initially recruited for the study, 84 (10.8%) were excluded from the statistical analysis due to incomplete or unavailable respiratory outcome information during the follow-up period. Consequently, 329 children with recurrent wheezing or asthma and 364 healthy subjects (with information available for at least 9 months of follow-up) were included in the study. The participants of each group excluded from the study did not differ from the included children of the same group with respect to baseline characteristics.

The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1. At baseline, the two cohorts were comparable regarding age distribution, maternal smoking during pregnancy, birth weight, duration of breastfeeding, living in proximity to a street with heavy traffic, presence of a stove/fireplace at home, and presence of pets at home. Male sex (p < 0.001), lower parental education (p < 0.001), paternal smoking during pregnancy (p < 0.001), parental history of atopy (p < 0.001), prematurity (p < 0.001), neonatal respiratory disease (p < 0.001), neonatal cardiac disease (p = 0.01), previous hospitalization for respiratory disease (p < 0.001), living in a house or villa (p = 0.004), small home size (p = 0.008), proximity to a factory (p < 0.001), residence in green areas (p = 0.046), smokers at home (p = 0.004) and absence of an air conditioning system at home (p = 0.007), were significantly more frequent in the recurrent wheezing/asthma group than in healthy children.
Table 1

Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of children with recurrent wheezing or asthma and healthy children

 

Wheezing/asthma (n = 364)

Healthy children (n = 389)

p-value

 

N

%

N

%

 

Age distribution

     

2-5 yrs

155

42.6

152

39.1

 

5-18 yrs

209

57.4

237

60.9

0.365

Sex

     

Male

237

65.1

196

50.4

 

Female

127

34.9

193

49.6

<0.001

Parental education a

     

Primary/secondary for both parents

36

9.9

17

4.4

 

High school for at least one parent

161

44.5

129

33.2

 

University degree for at least one parent

165

45.6

243

62.5

<0.001

Paternal smoking during pregnancy a

     

No

255

71.2

312

81.0

 

Yes

103

28.8

73

19.0

0.002

Maternal smoking during pregnancy a

     

No

329

91.6

353

91.5

 

Yes

30

8.4

33

8.5

0.92

Parental history of atopy a

     

No

269

74.9

343

90.5

 

Yes

90

25.1

36

9.5

<0.001

Gestational age (weeks) a

     

<37

56

15.6

26

6.8

 

≥37

304

84.4

357

93.2

<0.001

Birth weight (grams) a

     

≤2500

44

12.2

31

8.0

 

>2500-3500

227

62.9

245

63.1

 

>3500

90

24.9

112

28.9

0.11

Neonatal respiratory disease a

     

No

317

88.1

372

95.9

 

Yes

43

11.9

16

4.1

<0.001

Neonatal cardiac disease a

     

No

335

94.4

380

97.9

 

Yes

20

5.6

8

2.1

0.01

Breastfeeding (months)

     

No breastfeeding

70

19.2

56

14.4

 

≤6

152

41.8

152

39.1

 

>6

142

39.0

181

46.5

0.07

Previous hospitalization for respiratory disease a

     

No

187

52.2

339

87.4

 

Yes

171

47.8

49

12.6

<0.001

Home type a

     

Flat

318

87.8

364

93.8

 

House/villa

44

12.2

24

6.2

0.004

Home size (m 2 ) a

     

≤90

155

43.9

123

32.8

 

>90-110

103

29.2

127

33.9

 

>110

95

26.9

125

33.3

0.008

Proximity to car-traffic

     

No

168

46.2

169

43.4

 

Yes

196

53.8

220

56.6

0.46

Proximity to truck-traffic

     

No

304

83.5

342

87.9

 

Yes

60

16.5

47

12.1

0.08

Proximity to factories

     

No

327

89.8

375

96.4

 

Yes

37

10.2

14

3.6

<0.001

Residence in a green area

     

No

145

39.8

183

47.0

 

Yes

219

60.2

206

53.0

0.046

Smokers at home a

     

No

241

67.7

297

77.1

 

Yes

115

32.3

88

22.9

0.004

Presence of a stove/fireplace at home a

     

No

327

90.6

358

92.3

 

Yes

34

9.4

30

7.7

0.41

Presence of an air conditioning system at home a

     

No

170

47.1

145

37.4

 

Yes

191

52.9

243

62.6

0.007

Presence of dogs at home a

     

No

319

88.4

351

90.7

 

Yes

42

11.6

36

9.3

0.30

Presence of cats at home a

     

No

338

93.6

351

90.7

 

Yes

23

6.4

36

9.3

0.14

aThe sums do not add up to the total because of some missing values. p-values were calculated using the χ 2 test.

The occurrence of respiratory symptoms in both cohorts during the follow-up period is shown in Table 2. In comparison with healthy children, children with recurrent wheezing or asthma reported significantly more days of fever (p = 0.005) and cough (p < 0.001), episodes of rhinitis (p = 0.04) and tracheitis (p = 0.01), asthma attacks (p < 0.001), episodes of pneumonia (p < 0.001) and hospitalizations (p = 0.02). Children with recurrent wheezing/asthma and healthy children reported a similar number of episodes of rhinosinusitis, pharyngitis, acute otitis media and laryngitis.
Table 2

Respiratory symptoms during follow-up in children with recurrent wheezing or asthma and healthy children a

Clinical characteristics

Wheezing/asthma (n = 329)

Healthy children (n = 364)

p-value

 

N

%

N

%

 

Days with fever (≥37°), mean ± SD

7.3 ± 7.3

5.9 ± 6.4

0.009

0

66

20.1

92

25.3

 

1-4

87

26.4

99

27.2

 

5-9

74

22.5

101

27.7

 

≥10

102

31.0

72

19.8

0.005

Days with cough, mean ± SD

31.7 ± 29.9

17.9 ± 23.7

<0.001

0

20

6.1

81

22.2

 

1-6

33

10.0

68

18.7

 

7-20

107

32.5

108

29.7

 

≥21

169

51.4

107

29.4

<0.001

Rhinitis

     

0

270

82.1

321

88.2

 

1

38

11.5

23

6.3

 

≥2

21

6.4

20

5.5

0.04

Rhinosinusitis

     

0

315

95.7

351

96.4

 

≥1

14

4.3

13

3.6

0.64

Pharyngitis

     

0

239

72.6

274

75.3

 

1

52

15.8

56

15.4

 

≥2

38

11.6

34

9.3

0.61

Acute otitis media

     

0

263

79.9

313

86.0

 

1

40

12.2

28

7.7

 

≥2

26

7.9

23

6.3

0.09

Laryngitis

     

0

304

92.4

338

92.9

 

≥1

25

7.6

26

7.1

0.82

Tracheitis

     

0

294

89.4

344

94.5

 

≥1

35

10.6

20

5.5

0.01

Asthmatic attacks

     

0

170

51.7

335

92.0

 

1

63

19.1

19

5.2

 

2

46

14.0

4

1.1

 

≥3

50

15.2

6

1.7

<0.001

Pneumonia

     

0

221

67.2

309

84.9

 

1

61

18.5

31

8.5

 

≥2

47

14.3

24

6.6

<0.001

Hospitalizations

     

No

306

93.0

353

97.0

 

Yes

23

7.0

11

3.0

0.02

Subjects with a complete follow-up a

306

93.0

346

95.0

0.25

Months of follow-up, mean ± SD a

11.9 ± 0.6

11.9 ± 0.5

0.26

aAnalyses were based on subjects with available information for at least 9 months of follow-up. SD: standard deviation; p-values were calculated using the χ 2 test or Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test, as appropriate. Parental-eport of physician-diagnosed episodes.

Table 3 summarizes the indices of exposure to air pollutants and the incidence of asthmatic episodes during follow-up in the recurrent wheezing/asthma cohort. Living close to a street with a high density of traffic was a risk factor for asthma exacerbations (OR = 1.79; 95% CI, 1.13-2.84), whereas living near green areas was protective (OR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.31 -0.80).
Table 3

Indices of exposure to air pollution and incidence of asthmatic episodes a during follow-up in 329 children with recurrent wheezing or asthma b

 

Asthma episode(s) (n = 159)

No asthma episodes (n = 170)

OR (95% CI)c

 

N

%

N

%

 

Proximity to car-traffic

     

No

66

41.5

93

54.7

1 (reference)

Yes

93

58.5

77

45.3

1.79 (1.13-2.84)

Proximity to factories

     

No

144

90.6

150

88.2

1 (reference)

Yes

15

9.4

20

11.8

0.83 (0.40-1.74)

Residence in a green area

     

No

73

45.9

53

31.2

1 (reference)

Yes

86

54.1

117

68.8

0.50 (0.31-0.80)

aAt least one episode during follow-up; banalyses were based on subjects with available information for at least 9 months of follow-up; codds ratios (OR) adjusted for age, sex, number of siblings, parental education and presence of smokers at home.

Table 4 summarizes the multivariate RRs and 95% CIs for pneumonia events in the study population according to the levels of air pollutants. In the recurrent wheezing/asthmatic children, an increase of 10 μg/m3 of PM10 and NO2 increased the incidence of pneumonia (continuous RR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.00-1.17 for PM10; continuous RR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.01-1.17 for NO2).
Table 4

Multivariate rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of pneumonia events in children with recurrent wheezing or asthma and healthy children according to air pollutant levels

 

Asthmatic subjects (329 subjects; =143 events)

Healthy subjects (364 subjects; n = 80 events)

 

RR (95% CI)a

RR (95% CI)a

PM 10 (lag 0–2 days) b

  

Low (<30 μg/m3)

1 (reference)

1 (reference)

Intermediate (30- < 50 μg/m3)

1.23 (0.73-2.05)

1.47 (0.76-2.84)

High (≥50 μg/m3)

1.62 (0.92-2.87)

1.04 (0.46-2.33)

Continuous RR d

1.08 (1.00-1.17)

0.99 (0.88-1.11)

NO 2 (lag 0–2 days) c

  

Lowest tertile (<89 μg/m3)

1 (reference)

1 (reference)

Intermediate tertile (89- < 113 μg/m3)

1.20 (0.75-1.90)

1.45 (0.80-0.63)

Highest tertile (≥113 μg/m3)

1.56 (1.01-2.42)

1.24 (0.67-2.31)

Continuous RR d

1.08 (1.01-1.17)

1.02 (0.93-1.12)

aRRs and 95% CIs were obtained from multivariate repeated-measures analyses adjusted for age, sex, education of parents, presence of smokers at home, season, day of week, temperature and relative humidity; bthe mean of three days (day -2 to day 0) for the daily weighted average PM10 in the municipality of residence of each subject; cthe mean of three days (day -2 to day 0) of the maximum daily level of NO2 in the municipality of residence of each subject. dthe results represent the increase (or decrease) in risk corresponding to an increment of 10 μg/m3 in the level of the pollutant examined.

Discussion

The results of the present study demonstrate that exposure to traffic-related air pollution is associated with an increased risk of respiratory morbidity in children with pre-exisiting asthma or lower respiratory tract disease with wheezing. Our findings are consistent with the results of a recent prospective study in Sweden in which 4,089 children followed from birth to the age of 12 years showed a positive association between exposure to air pollution (PM10 and NO2) during early years of life and asthma exacerbations [20]. Additionally, the association between exposure to particulates and persistent wheezing during infancy was confirmed in the Cincinnati birth cohort study of more than 700 infants born to atopic parents [21]. Furthermore, a cross-sectional study conducted in China of more than 3,000 schoolchildren documented that long-term exposure to high air pollution concentrations was associated with reduction in lung function and that asthmatic children were more susceptible to this effect [22].

The finding that episodes of bronchial obstruction related to air pollution due to traffic occurs almost exclusively in children born to atopic parents or in children who have been previously diagnosed with wheezing or asthma could be clinically relevant because it could permit the early identification of subjects living in areas with traffic-related air pollution who have an increased risk for the development of respiratory problems later in life. However, this conclusion should be considered with caution for several reasons. Most of the data that lead to this conclusion, such as those regarding home environment and the risk of pollution exposure, were reported by the parents and, consequently, had debatable reliability. Moreover, to be born to atopic parents does not mean that a child is himself atopic and that has an increased risk of development of bronchial hyperresponsiveness. The analysis of the characteristics of the enrolled children revealed that the two groups of subjects were substantially different from a socio-economic point of view. The asthma cohort had parents with lower level of education and lived in less elaborate homes because smaller and more frequently not air conditioned. A number of studies has reported that socio-economic status could condition response to air pollution with the adverse effects greater in individuals in lower social classes [2325]. Consequently, it is possible that, at least in part, the results of this study could be due to the difference in socio-economic status of patients in comparison to healthy controls.

Moreover, the period of study was relatively short and it cannot be excluded that a longer study duration could have led to different results.. It has been reported that children with long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution can develop respiratory disease after several years [1014]. Consequently, some of the healthy children included in the present study, particularly the youngest, could have developed bronchial obstruction after the study was concluded. Moreover, the genetic characteristics of the enrolled children, which differ from those that lead to atopy and were not considered in this study, could have reduced or increased susceptibility of the children to wheezing or asthma independently of traffic-related pollutants. The close relationship between genetic variants and increased susceptibility to bronchial obstruction has been repeatedly reported [26, 27].

In the present study, the risk of developing wheezing or asthma was strictly related to the degree of exposure to traffic-related air pollutants, with fewer incidences occurring in children living in a green area compared with those living in areas with the highest degree of air pollution. This finding is consistent with the results of several studies showing greater evidence of an association between traffic-related air pollutants and respiratory problems in children living near roads with heavy traffic with a higher incidence of exacerbations with increasing concentrations of pollutants [28, 29].

In this study a close association between paternal smoking during pregnancy, prematurity, respiratory and cardiac diseases at birth with recurrent wheezing or asthma was found, in agreement with previous reports [30, 31]. We did not find any significant differences between the two groups with respect to the duration of breastfeeding, in contrast to the results of some studies showing a protective role of human milk in the development of asthma [32, 33] and consistent with research that failed to demonstrate any long-term protection [34, 35]. In our study, children with recurrent wheezing or asthma had greater exposure than healthy controls to passive smoke in their homes. It is surprising and unfortunate that despite the well-known negative effects of passive smoke on recurrent or chronic respiratory disease [3], children with recurrent wheezing or asthma continued to be exposed to this risk factor. We did not detect any differences between children with recurrent wheezing or asthma with respect to the presence of domestic pets, particularly cats and dogs. This result appeared to exclude an effect of pet ownership on respiratory symptoms and was consistent with some previous findings [36]. However, it has been reported that exposure to cats during the first year of life is an independent risk factor for wheezing and asthma at the age of 7 years [37].

In the present study, traffic-related pollutants appeared to play a relevant role in conditioning the incidence of respiratory infections. Children with atopy or recurrent wheezing or asthma presented more respiratory tract infections including pneumonia compared with control subjects. These findings are not surprising as patients with asthma are more susceptible to recurrent viral respiratory infections [38]. Allergic inflammation in the airways leads to an impaired barrier function that facilitates the penetration of infectious particulate allergens, favoring the development of inflammatory responses and impaired interferon responses to viral infection in asthmatic children irrespective of their atopic status [39, 40]. However, in the current study, in children with recurrent wheezing or asthma but not in healthy controls, pneumonia events appeared to be related to the concentrations of PM10 and NO2, clearly supporting the hypothesis that traffic-related air pollution increases the risk of respiratory infections. However, other studies have demonstrated an association between exposure to common air pollutants and susceptibility as well as severity of respiratory infections. In a recent meta-analysis, Dherani et al. documented that the risk of pneumonia nearly doubled in young children exposed to unprocessed solid fuels [41]. Gurley et al. showed that each hour of exposure to PM2.5 concentrations exceeding 100 μg/m3 was associated with a 7% increase in the incidence of acute lower respiratory infections among children aged 0–11 months [42]. Finally, a study conducted in 33,632 Italian children (aged 6–7 years) and adolescents showed that children living in polluted areas had a great risk of cough or phlegm, whereas traffic pollution was weakly associated with asthmatic symptoms [43]. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to demonstrate that the effects of air pollution on the occurrence of respiratory tract infections are observed only in children with recurrent wheezing or asthma. This finding might be explained by an increase in pollution-induced airway inflammation, genetic susceptibility to oxidative stress and the role of epigenetics in lung damage induced by air pollutants [3].

A further limitation of the present study is that children suffering from recurrent wheezing and asthma were considered in the same group. The former is not a homogeneous disease, and only a few phenotypes of wheezing can be considered as asthma before the school age [44]. Limiting the analysis to older children would permit a more reliable diagnosis of asthma but would exclude the younger age group in which exposure to air pollution is known to be associated with an increased risk of subsequent asthma onset. Moreover, respiratory diseases were assessed based on a parental questionnaire, which could have been influenced by a number of subjective issues. We tried to limit the bias in responses with weekly telephone calls by medical practitioners. A final limitation is that we focused on traffic pollution in the zone of residence but did not collect information about other outdoor exposures such as those near schools.

Conclusions

Our findings provide evidence that there is a significant association between air pollution associated with traffic and asthma exacerbations and respiratory infections in children born to atopic parents and in children suffering from recurrent wheezing or asthma. Although this association may also occur in healthy children, correlating with the duration and intensity of exposure, children with a pre-existing respiratory susceptibility seem to be more vulnerable to the adverse effects of air pollutants. Further studies are needed to confirm this finding and to evaluate whether other factors can contribute to this association.

Abbreviations

95% CI: 

95% confidence intervals

NO2

Nitrogen dioxide

ORs: 

Odds ratios

PM10

Particulates less than 10 microns in diameter

RR: 

Rate ratio.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from the Italian Ministry of Health (Bando Giovani Ricercatori 2009). We thank all of the children and families that participated in this study as well as the medical staff, without whose dedication this project could not have been completed.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Pediatric Highly Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
(2)
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano
(3)
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

References

  1. Venn AJ, Lexis SA, Cooper M, Hubbard R, Britton J: Living near a main road and the risk of wheezing illness in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001, 164: 2177-2180.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Grigg J: Air pollution and children’s respiratory health-gaps in the global evidence. Clin Exp Allergy. 2011, 41: 1072-1075.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Esposito S, Tenconi R, Lelii M, Preti V, Nazzari E, Consolo S, Patria MF: Possible molecular mechanisms linking air pollution and asthma in children. BMC Pulm Med. 2014, 14: 31-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Schwartz J: Air pollution and children’s health. Pediatrics. 2004, 113: 1037-1043.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Trasande L, Thurston GD: The role of air pollution in asthma and other pediatric morbidities. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005, 115: 689-699.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Moya J, Bearer CF, Etzel RA: Children’s behavior and physiology and how it effects exposure to environmental contaminants. Pediatrics. 2004, 113: 996-1006.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Goldman L, Falk H, Landrigan PJ, Balk SJ, Reigart JR, Etzel RA: Environmental pediatrics and its impact on government health policy. Pediatrics. 2004, 113 (4 Suppl.): 1146-1157.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Valent F, Little DA, Bertollini R: Burden of disease attributable to selected environmental factors and injury among children and adolescents in Europe. Lancet. 2004, 363: 2032-2039.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Sigmund E, De Ste CM, Miklánková L, Frömel K: Physical activity patterns of kindergarten children in comparison to teenagers and young adults. Eur J Public Health. 2007, 17: 646-651.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Sucharew H, Ryan PH, Bernstein D, Succop P, Khurana Hershey GK, Lockey J, Villareal M, Reponen T, Grinshpun S, Le Masters G: Exposure to traffic exhaust and night cough during early childhood: the CCAAPS birth cohort. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2010, 21: 253-259.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Zora JE, Sarnat SE, Raysoni AU, Johnson BA, Li WW, Greenwald R, Holguin F, Stock TH, Sarnat JA: Associations between urban air pollution and pediatric asthma control in El Paso, Texas. Sci Total Environ. 2013, 448: 56-65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rojas-Martinez R, Perez-Padilla R, Olaiz-Fernandez G, Mendoza-Alvarado L, Moreno-Macias H, Fortoul T, McDonnell W, Loomis D, Romieu I: Lung function growth in children with long term exposure to air pollutants in Mexico City. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007, 176: 377-384.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen H, Goldberg MS, Villeneuve PJ: A systematic review of the relation between long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and chronic diseases. Rev Environ Health. 2008, 23: 243-297.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Schultz E, Gruzieva O, Bellander T, Bottai M, Hallberg J, Kull I, Svartengren M, Melén E, Pershagen G: Traffic-related air pollution and lung function in children at 8 years of age: a birth cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012, 186: 1286-1291.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Brauer M, Hoek G, Smit HA, de Jongste JC, Gerritsen J, Postma DS, Kerkhof M, Brunekreef B: Air pollution and development of asthma, allergy and infections in a birth cohort. Eur Respir J. 2007, 29: 879-888.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Migliore E, Berti G, Galassi C, SIDRIA -2 Collaborative Group: Respiratory symptoms in children living near busy roads and their relationship to vehicular traffic: results of an Italian multicenter study (SIDRIA 2). Environ Health. 2009, 8: 27-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Waibel V, Ulmer H, Horak E: Assessing asthma control: symptom scores, GINA levels of asthma control, lung function, and exhaled nitric oxide. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2012, 47: 113-118.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Santus P, Russo A, Madonini E, Allegra L, Blasi F, Centanni S, Miadonna A, Schiraldi G, Amaducci S: How air pollution influences clinical management of respiratory diseases. A case-crossover study in Milan. Respir Res. 2012, 13: 95-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Silibello C, Calori G, Brusasca G, Giudici A, Angelino E, Fossati G, Peroni E, Buganza E: Modelling of PM10 concentrations over Milano urban area: validation and sensivity analysis of two aerosol modules. Environ Model Softw. 2008, 23: 333-343.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Liang KY, Zeger SL: Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986, 73: 13-22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Gruzieva O, Bergström A, Hulchiy O, Kull I, Lind T, Melén E, Moskalenko V, Pershagen G, Bellander T: Exposure to air pollution from traffic and childhood asthma until 12 years of age. Epidemiology. 2013, 24: 54-61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Bernstein DI: Diesel exhaust exposure, wheezing and sneezing. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2012, 4: 178-183.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Gao Y, Chan EY, Li LP, He QQ, Wong TW: Chronic effects of ambient air pollution on lung function among Chinese children. Arch Dis Child. 2013, 98: 128-135.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wheeler BW, Ben-Shlomo Y: Environmental equity, air quality, socioeconomic status, and respiratory health: a linkage analysis of routine data from the Health Survey for England. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005, 59: 948-954.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee JT1, Son JY, Kim H, Kim SY: Effect of air pollution on asthma-related hospital admissions for children by socioeconomic status associated with area of residence. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2006, 61: 123-130.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Yap PS, Gilbreath S, Garcia C, Jareen N, Goodrich B: The influence of socioeconomic markers on the association between fine particulate matter and hospital admissions for respiratory conditions among children. Am J Public Health. 2013, 103: 695-702.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Suttner K, Rosenstiel P, Depner M, Schedel M, Pinto LA, Ruether A, Adamski J, Klopp N, Illig T, Vogelberg C, Schreiber S, von Mutius E, Kabesch M: TBX21 gene variants increase childhood asthma risk in combination with HLX1 variants. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009, 123: 1062-1068.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim JJ, Smorodinsky S, Lipsett M, Singer BC, Hodgson AT, Ostro B: Traffic-related air pollution near busy roads: the East Bay Children’s Respiratory Health Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004, 170: 520-526.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ryan PH, Holguin F: Traffic pollution as a risk factor for developing asthma: Are the issues resolved?. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010, 181: 530-531.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Caudri D, Savenije OE, Smit HA, Postma DS, Koppelman GH, Wijga AH, Kerkhof M, Gehring U, Hoekstra MO, Brunekreef B, de Jongste JC: Perinatal risk factor for wheezing phenotypes in the first 8 years of life. Clin Exp Allergy. 2013, 43: 1395-1405.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Polito A, Piga S, Cogo PE, Corchia C, Carnielli V, Da Frè M, Di Lallo D, Favia I, Gagliardi L, Macagno F, Miniaci S, Cuttini M: Increased morbidity and mortality in very preterm/VLBW infants with congenital heart disease. Intensive Care Med. 2013, 3: 91104-91112.Google Scholar
  32. Ehlayel MS, Bener A: Duration of breast-feeding and the risk of childhood allergic diseases in a developing country. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2008, 29: 386-391.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Bener A, Ehlayel MS, Alsowaidi S, Sabbah A: Role of breast feeding in primary prevention of asthma and allergic diseases in a traditional society. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007, 39: 337-343.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Matheson MC, Allen KJ, Tang ML: Understanding the evidence for and against the role of breastfeeding in allergy prevention. Clin Exp Allergy. 2012, 42: 827-851.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Wright AL, Holberg CJ, Taussig LM, Martinez FD: Relationship of infant feeding to recurrent wheezing at age 6 years. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995, 149: 758-763.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lodge CJ, Lowe AJ, Gurrin LC, Matheson MC, Balloch A, Axelrad C, Hill DJ, Hosking CS, Rodrigues S, Svanes C, Abramson MJ, Allen KJ, Dharmage SC: Pets at birth do not increase allergic disease in at-risk children. Clin Exp Allergy. 2012, 42: 1377-1385.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lødrup Carlsen KC, Roll S, Carlsen KH, GALEN WP 1.5 ‘Birth Cohorts’ working group: Does pet ownership in infancy lead to asthma or allergy at school age? Pooled analysis of individual participant data from 11 European birth cohorts. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e43214-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Holgate ST: The sentinel role of the airway epithelium in asthma pathogenesis. Immunol Rev. 2011, 242: 205-219.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Baraldo S, Contoli M, Bazzan E, Turato G, Padovani A, Marku B, Calabrese F, Caramori G, Ballarin A, Snijders D, Barbato A, Saetta M, Papi A: Deficient antiviral immune responses in childhood: distinct roles of atopy and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012, 130: 1307-1314.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Sykes A, Edwards MR, Macintyre J, del Rosario A, Bakhsoliani E, Trujillo-Torralbo MB, Kon OM, Mallia P, McHale M, Johnston SL: Rhinovirus 16-induced IFN-α and IFN-β are deficient in bronchoalveolar lavage cells in asthmatic patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012, 129: 1506-1514.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Dherani M, Pope D, Mascarenhas M, Smith KR, Weber M, Bruce N: Indoor air pollution from unprocessed solid fuel use and pneumonia risk in children aged under five years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2008, 86: 390-398C.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Gurley ES, Homaira N, Salje H, Ram PK, Haque R, Petri W: Indoor exposure to particulate matter and the incidence of acute lower respiratory infections among children: a birth cohort study in urban Bangladesh. Indoor Air. 2013, 23: 379-386.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Migliore E, Berti G, Galassi C, SIDRIA Collaborative Group: Respiratory symptoms in children living near busy roads and their relationship to vehicular traffic: results of an Italian multicenter study (SIDRIA 2). Environ Health. 2009, 8: 27-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Henderson J, Granell R, Heron J, Sherriff A, Simpson A, Woodcock A, Strachan DP, Shaheen SO, Sterne JA: Association of wheezing phenotypes in the first 6 years of life with atopy, lung function and airway responsiveness in mid-childhood. Thorax. 2008, 63: 974-980.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/14/130/prepub

Copyright

© Esposito et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement