Diagnostic pitfalls in fine needle aspiration of solitary pulmonary nodules: two cases with radio-cyto-histological correlation
© Torkian et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003
Received: 14 June 2003
Accepted: 08 September 2003
Published: 08 September 2003
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|14 Jun 2003||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Jun 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jasim Radhi|
|4 Aug 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrea Nicolini|
|14 Aug 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Rani Kanthan|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|14 Aug 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|4 Sep 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Rani Kanthan|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|4 Sep 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|8 Sep 2003||Editorially accepted|
|8 Sep 2003||Article published||10.1186/1471-2466-3-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.