Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of two laboratory-developed PCR methods for the diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Brazilian patients with and without HIV infection

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Apr 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
31 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Moses Joloba
31 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kim Musser
24 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Luciene Cardoso Scherer
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Moses Joloba
21 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Stivers
13 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Luciene Cardoso Scherer
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Stivers
11 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Luciene Cardoso Scherer
Resubmission - Version 4
11 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Luciene Cardoso Scherer
Resubmission - Version 5
22 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
29 Mar 2011 Editorially accepted
29 Mar 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2466-11-15

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement