Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of treatment differences in secondary efficacy endpoints

From: Fluticasone/formoterol combination therapy is as effective as fluticasone/salmeterol in the treatment of asthma, but has a more rapid onset of action: an open-label, randomized study

Secondary endpoint

Analysis population

Statistical analysis

Difference Fluticasone/formoterol - fluticasone/salmeterol

Discontinuations due to lack of efficacy (%)

PP

%

–1.1

  

95% CIa,b

–4.6, 2.5*

Time to onset of action of study medication (minutes)

FAS

Hazard ratio

1.64

  

95% CI

1.28, 2.10

  

p value

< 0.001*

Rescue medication use (% of study days)

FAS

HL estimate

2.24

  

95% CI

–0.03, 7.06

  

p value

0.157

Rescue medication use (number of uses)

FAS

HL estimate

0.02

  

95% CI

0.00, 0.11

  

p value

0.164

Pre-dose PEFR at week 12 (L/min)

FAS

LS mean

–13.6

  

95% CI

–34.9, 7.6

  

p value

0.208

2-hour post-dose PEFR at week 12 (L/min)

FAS

LS mean

–10.0

  

95% CI

–33.6, 13.7

  

p value

0.408

Other lung function parameters (FVC, MEF25, MEF50 and MEF75)

FAS

LS mean

No statistically significant differences between the treatment groups

  

95% CI

 
  

p value

 

Asthma symptom scores (mean values)

FAS

Meanc

0.15

  

95% CI

–0.04, 0.34

  

p value

0.122

Sleep disturbance scores (mean values)

FAS

Meanc

0.00

  

95% CI

–0.12, 0.11

  

p value

0.975

Asthma exacerbations: mild/moderate

FAS

n (%)

Fluticasone/formoterol: 11 (10.9)

   

Fluticasone/salmeterol: 12 (11.9)

  

p value

> 0.999

Asthma exacerbations: severe

FAS

n (%)

Fluticasone/formoterol: 3 (3.0)

   

Fluticasone/salmeterol: 1 (1.0)

  

p value

0.621

Patient assessment of study medication (scores at week 12)

FAS

Odds ratio

0.495

  

95% CIc

0.289, 0.848

AQLQ (scores at week 12)

FAS

Mean (SD)

Fluticasone/formoterol: 5.4 (1.1)

   

Fluticasone/salmeterol: 5.5 (0.9)

  

p value

0.051

  1. *Statistically significant non-inferiority (discontinuations due to lack of efficacy) or superiority (time to onset of action) of fluticasone/formoterol versus fluticasone/salmeterol based on sequential gatekeeping approach.
  2. aNon-inferiority of fluticasone/formoterol to fluticasone/salmeterol is shown if the upper limit of the 95% CI is ≤ 10%.
  3. b p value not calculated.
  4. cAdjusted mean from linear model on mean score with treatment group as factor.
  5. AQLQ, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire; CI, confidence interval; FAS, full analysis set; FVC, forced vital capacity; HL, Hodges Lehmann; LS, least-squares; MEF25; MEF50; MEF75, maximum expiratory flow rate at, respectively, 25%; 50%; and 75% of the volume to exhale; PEFR, peak expiratory flow rate; PP, per protocol population; SD, standard deviation.