Skip to main content

Table 3 Outcome measures and main effects in the included SR’s

From: Effects of controlled breathing exercises and respiratory muscle training in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from evaluating the quality of evidence in systematic reviews

Authors (year)

BCE or RMT

I and C group (design of comparison)

Intervention descriptor and duration

Outcome variable (measure)

No. of trials (No. of subjects)

Pooled statistics on main effect variables MD/WMD/NU and/or SES (95%CI), p-value, (Effect in favor of intervention or control)

Authors’ comments on quality measure

Authors’ conclusion

Holland et al. (2012) [14]

DB, PLB, YB

PLB compared with no BE (RCT)

8 -12 weeks training

Dyspnea (BS)

2 (19)

NQPD (NS)

Low QOE*

The effects of breathing exercises on breathlessness and well-being were variable.

Dyspnea (UCSD Shortness of Breath Questionnaire)

2 (19)

NQPD (NS)

Low QOE*

Dyspnea (MRCS)

1 (30)

NQPD (I)

NR

Dyspnea (Hiratsuka Scale)

2 (60)

MD -12.94 (-22.29, -3.60), p = 0.0066, (I)

Low QOE*

Health condition (Hiratsuka Scale)

2 (60)

MD 6.19 (-5.24,17.61), p = 0.29 (NS)

NR

Mood (Hiratsuka Scale)

2 (60)

MD 1.08 (-9.60,11.75), p = 0.84 (NS)

NR

Social function (Hiratsuka Scale)

2 (60)

MD 11.69 (-0.91,24.28), p = 0.069 (NS)

NR

House work (Hiratsuka Scale)

2 (60)

MD 15.58 (0.5,30.66), p = 0.043 (C)

NR

Headache (Hiratsuka Scale)

2 (60)

MD -3.30 (-12.37,5.77), p = 0.48 (NS)

NR

Appetite (Hiratsuka Scale)

2 (60)

MD 8.42 (-5.3,22.15), p = 0.23 (NS)

NR

Well being (Hiratsuka Scale)

2 (60)

MD 0.09 (-9.80,9.98), p = 0.99 (NS)

NR

QOL (Cai scale)

1 (89)

NQPD (I)

NR

DB compared with no BE (RCT)

4-12 weeks training

Dyspnea (MRCS)

1(30)

NQPD (NS)

Moderate QOE*

QOL (St. George RQ)

1(30)

NQPD (I)

Moderate QOE*

Yoga compared with no BE (RCT)

12 weeks training

Dyspnea intensity (BS)

1 (29)

NQPD (NS)

Low QOE*

Dyspnea distress (BS)

1 (29)

NQPD (NS)

Low QOE*

Dyspnoea-related QOL

1 (29)

NQPD (NS)

NR

Health QOL (St. George RQ)

1 (45)

NQPD (I)

Moderate QOE*

PLB compared with EMT (RCT)

4-12 weeks training

Dyspnea (BS, SOBQ)

2 (17)

NQPD (I (PLB) on 12 weeks, NS on 4 weeks)

Low QOE*

Low QOE*

Dypsnea (UCSD Shortness of Breath Questionnaire)

2 (17)

NQPD (NS)

 

DB, PLB and nutritional (RCT)

NR

QOL (Cai scale)

1 (71)

NQPD (NS)

NR

Roberts. et al. (2009) [30]

PLB

PLB during everyday activities or during exercise (PP)

NR in table #

Dyspnea (BS)

5 (110)

40% relief (range 0%–to 63%) # (NR)

Low and moderate QOE # **

PLB has a role in the symptomatic management of stable COPD.

Geddes et al. (2008) [13]

IMT

Inspiratory muscle training versus intervention sham (RCT)

Intensity ≥30%–60% or max load, Pimax (threshold) 15–30 minutes 1–2 pr. day, 3–7 days pr. week for 5–24 weeks.

Dyspnea (BS)

4 (99)

WMD -1.76, (-2.35, -1.16),

No score given. Descriptive summary of the MQ is provided.

IMT improves measure of quality of life and decreases dyspnea for adults with stable COPD.

p <0.00001, (I)

Dyspnea (TDI focal score)

5 (96)

WMD 2.55, (0.92, 4.19), p = 0.002, (I)

60% MVV (normocapnic hyperpnea tube breathing) 15 minutes × 2 pr. day, 7 days a week for 5 weeks.

Dyspnea (TDI functional impairment)

3 (56)

WMD 0.72, (0.14, 1.31), p = 0.02, (I)

Dyspnea (TDI magnitude of task)

3 (56)

WMD 0.74, (0.49, 1.0), p <0.00001, (I)

Dyspnea (TDI magnitude of effort)

3 (56)

WMD 0.48, (0.24, 0.72), p <0.0001, (I)

Quality of life (CRQ total score)

2 (69)

WMD 0.33, (0.19, 0.47), p <0.00001, (I)

Gosselink et al. (2011) [31]

IMT

IMT versus control (RCT)

Intensity ≥30%, Pimax (threshold load) or endurance training in controlled manner (inclusion criteria), 15–90 minute × 2–3 pr. day, 5–7 days a week, for 4 weeks to 12 months.##

Dyspnea (BS)

14(NR)

NU -0.9, SES -0.45, (-0.66 to -0.24),

MQ score from 30–83% (median 59%) of the maximum score.**

IMT improves dyspnea and health QOL.

p <0.001, (I)

Dyspnea (TDI score)

4 (NR)

NU +2.8, SES 1.58, (0.86–2.3),

p <0.001, (I)

Dyspnea (CRQ)

9 (NR)

NU +1.1, SES 0.34, (-0.03–0.71),

p = 0.068, (I)

Quality of life (CRQ score)

9 (NR)

NU +3.8, SES 0.34, (0.09–0.6), p = 0.007, (I)

Fatigue (CRQ score)

10 (NR)

NU + 0.9, SES 0.27, (0.03–0.5),

p = 0.024, (I)

Emotion (CRQ score)

10 (NR)

NU + 0.5, SES 0.19, (-0.04–0.42),

p = 0.107

Mastery (CRQ score)

10 (NR)

NU–0.005, SES 0.09, (-0.14–0.33), p = 0.432

O’Brien et al. (2008) [32]

IMT

Combined IMT and exercise versus exercise alone (RCT)

Intensity 30%, Pimax-60% (threshold), 30 minutes × 1 pr. day 5 days a week for 16 weeks. <72% MVV (Normocapnic hyperventilation) 1–20 minutes × 1 pr. day, 3 days a week for 8 weeks.

Quality of life CRQ dyspnea

2 (57)

WMD -1.94, (-2.88, -1.01), p <0.0001, (I)

No score given. MQ information given in a table in the SR.

Results of dyspnea and QOL are less clear. Further trials are required.

Quality of life CRQ fatigue

2 (57)

WMD -0.23, (-3.85, 3.4), p = 0.9

Shoemaker et. al. (2009) [34]

IMT

IMT versus control

Intensity load 17-100% Pimax, 15–30 minutes daily, 3–7 days a week for 8–24 weeks

Dyspnea (during IMT)

3 (85)

NQPD ##

Score 40-90% level 1b ****

IMT improve dyspnea and QOL in COPD patients

QOL

6 (188)

NQPD ##

Thomas et al. (2010) [33]

IMT

IMT at home versus control (RCT)

No information on intensity, 30–60 minutes pr. day × 3–6 pr. week, for 3–12 months.

Dyspnea (TDI score)

3 (57)

MD 2.36 (0.76, 3.96), p = 0.004, (I) ##

Score of 5 in one study and 7 in two studies.***

IMT may improve breathlessness during activities of daily living in severe COPD.

  1. BCE: Breathing control exercise, BS: Borg Score (range 0–10), C: Control, CI: Confidence interval, CRQ: Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (range 0–7), DB: Diaphragmatic breathing, EMT: Expiratory muscle training, I: Intervention, IMT: Inspiratory muscle training, MD: Mean difference, MRCS: Medical Research Council Score, MQ: Methodological quality, N: Number, NQPD = No quantitative pooling data, NR: Not registered, NS: Not significant, NU: Natural units, PLB: Pursed-lip breathing, QOE: Quality of evidence, RCT: Randomized controlled trial, RQ: Respiratory Questionnaire, SES: Summary effect size, SOBS: Shortness of Breath Score, St. George RQ: St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (range 0–100), TDI: Transition Dyspnea Index (range -9–9), UCSD Shortness of Breath Questionnaire: University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (range 0–120), WMD: Weighted mean difference, YB: Yoga breathing.
  2. *Used the GRADE Working grades of evidence (High quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect; Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate; Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and not likely to change the estimate).
  3. **Used a modification of the framework for methodological quality used by Smith et al.
  4. ***Used PEDro methodological quality score (range 0–10). Higher scores indicate better quality.
  5. **** Used the evaluation scale developed by Medlicott and Harris. Scores: 80–100% = strong quality; 60–79% = moderate quality; <59 = low quality. Studies with weak methodological rigor were assigned an evidence level of 2b.
  6. #Difficulty reading information from tables and text.
  7. ##Single studies not reported due to difficulties of reading out the exact design and effect from text and/or tables.