A systematic review on tracheostomy decannulation: a proposal of a quantitative semiquantitative clinical score
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Jul 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|9 Jul 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Pierachille Santus|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|9 Jul 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Nov 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gabriele Bassi|
|13 Nov 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roberto Fumagalli|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Nov 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Pierachille Santus|
|27 Nov 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roberto Fumagalli|
|9 Dec 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gabriele Bassi|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|27 Nov 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|11 Dec 2014||Editorially accepted|
|15 Dec 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2466-14-201|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.