1. Was a well-defined question asked in an answerable form? |
2. Was a comprehensive description of the competing alternatives provided? |
3. Was there evidence that the program's effectiveness was established? |
4. Were all the important and relevant costs & consequences identified? |
5. Were costs and consequences measured accurately with appropriate physical units? |
6. Were costs and consequences credibly valued? |
7. Were costs and consequences adjusted for differential timing? |
8. Was an incremental analysis of costs and consequences of alternatives performed? |
9. Was a sensitivity analysis performed? |
10. Did the presentation and discussion of the study results include all issues of concern to users? |