Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Evaluation of psychological and physiological predictors of fatigue in patients with COPD

  • Agnieszka Lewko1, 2Email author,
  • Penelope L Bidgood3 and
  • Rachel Garrod4
Contributed equally
BMC Pulmonary Medicine20099:47

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-9-47

Received: 2 June 2009

Accepted: 21 October 2009

Published: 21 October 2009

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Jun 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Jul 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Esther Barreiro
21 Jul 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mary Kapella
3 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - Agnieszka Lewko
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Sep 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Esther Barreiro
29 Sep 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mary Kapella
9 Oct 2009 Author responded Author comments - Agnieszka Lewko
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Oct 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Oct 2009 Author responded Author comments - Agnieszka Lewko
Resubmission - Version 5
16 Oct 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
21 Oct 2009 Editorially accepted
21 Oct 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2466-9-47

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Faculty of Health and Social Care Sciences, St. George's University of London
(2)
Kingston University
(3)
Faculty of Computing, Information Systems and Mathematics, Kingston University
(4)
Kings College NHS Foundation Trust, Dulwich Hospital

Advertisement