This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Infection biomarkers in primary care patients with acute respiratory tract infections–comparison of Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein
© Meili et al. 2016
Received: 4 December 2015
Accepted: 15 March 2016
Published: 24 March 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|4 Dec 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|30 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Edurne Almirall|
|22 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Qi Guo|
|24 Feb 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Marc Meili|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|24 Feb 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Mar 2016||Editorially accepted|
|24 Mar 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12890-016-0206-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.