Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of patients using regular metered dose inhalers, and univariate comparison of 10 correct steps vs 3 errors or more, and no critical error vs critical errors

From: Predictors of correct technique in patients using pressurized metered dose inhalers

 

All

10–12 steps

<10steps

P value

No critical error

critical error

P value

All

208

133(63.9%)

75(36.1%)

 

67(32.2%)

141(67.8%)

 

Male gender

97(46.6%)

69(51.9%)

28(37.7%)

0.04

31(46.3%)

66(46.8%)

0.94

Mean age(STD)

57.6(15.4)

57(14.5)

58.6(16.9)

0.45

57.6(12.5)

57.6(16.6)

0.99

Asthma diagnosis

164(78.9%)

110(82.7%)

54(72.0%)

0.08

57(85.1%)

107(75.9%)

0.11

Advised to use spacer

170(81.7%)

109(82%)

61(81.3%)

0.91

56(83.6%)

114(80.9%)

0.626

Observed to use spacer

132(63.5%)

78(58.6%)

54(72%)

0.05

38(56.7%)

94(66.7%)

0.17

Inhaled corticosteroids

180(86.6%)

120(90.2%)

60(80%)

0.05

59(88.1%)

121(85.8%)

0.65

LABA via aerolizer

68(32.7%)

43(32.3%)

25(33.3%)

0.88

19(28.4%)

49(34.8%)

0.35

Inhaled ipratropium bromide

38(18.3%)

21(15.8%)

17(22.7%)

0.24

30(21.3%)

8(11.9%)

0.12

Mean education 1–4 (STD)

2.09(0.98)

2.21(1.03)

1.88(0.85)

0.014

2.24(1.0)

2.02(0.97)

0.14

Married status

136(65.4%)

92(69.2%)

44(58.7%)

0.13

48(71.6%)

88(62.4%)

0.18

Smoker Y/N

24(11.5%)

13(9.8%)

11(14.7%)

0.31

7(10.4%)

17(12.1%)

0.72

Resp physician Follow up

144(69.2%)

92(69.2%)

52(69.3%)

0.98

43(64.2%)

101(71.6%)

0.26

Resp physician explained Y/N

185(88.9%)

118(88.7%)

67(89.3%)

0.89

63(94%)

122(86.5%)

0.06

Resp explained – number of times 1–7

3.37(2.8)

4(2.70)

3.37(2.62)

0.16

3.9(2.64)

3.74(2.71)

0.28

Resp physician time to explain 1–5

1.81(1.37)

1.91(1.46)

1.63(1.18)

0.13

1.85(1.38)

1.78(1.37)

0.76

GP follow up

87(41.8%)

54(40.6%)

33(44%)

0.94

27(40.3%)

60(42.6%)

0.8

GP explained Y/N

104(50%)

69(51.9%)

35(46.7%)

0.47

32(47.8%)

72(51.1%

0.66

GP explained times 0–7

1.43(2.19)

1.40(2.12)

1.48(3.27)

0.8

1.36(2.12)

1.46(2.22)

0.75

GP time to explain(0–5)

0.97(1.25)

1(1.27)

0.92(1.23)

0.66

0.96(1.33)

0.98(1.22)

0.9

Any follow up

187(89.9%)

119(89.5%)

68(90.7%)

0.78

59(88.1%)

128(90.8%)

0.56

Other health care professional explained

60(28.9%)

48(36.1%)

12(16%)

0.001

21(31.3%)

39(27.7%)

0.59

Info-other source

86(41.4%)

56(42.1%)

30(40%)

0.77

31(46.3%)

55(39%)

0.37

Years of inhaler use (decades)

1.88(1.59)

2.02(1.58)

1.62(1.58)

0.08

2.01(1.46)

1.82(1.65)

0.4

Technique self-score 0–10

7.8(2.25)

8.06(2.02)

7.28(2.56)

0.025

7.96(2.21)

7.7(2.28)

0.434

Perception as effective 1–5

2.45(0.8)

2.4(0.735)

2.48(0.84)

0.47

2.4(0.74)

2.48

0.47

Ease of use 1–5 (SD)

3.1(1.0)

3.15(0.97)

2.97(0.99)

0.21

3.12(0.95)

3.07(1.0)

0.74

Concern inhaler side effects 0/1

44(21.2%)

30(22.6%)

14(18.7%)

0.6

19(28.4%)

25(17.7%)

0.09

Diabetes

34(16.35%)

20(15%)

14(18.7%)

0.51

12(17.9%)

22(15.6%)

0.68

Cholesterol

59(28.4%)

33(24.8%)

26(34.7%)

0.14

16(23.9%)

43(30.5%)

0.31

Hypertension

93(44.71%)

56(42.1%)

37(49.3%)

0.32

30(44.8%)

63(44.7%)

0.99

Heart disease

34(16.4%)

14(10.5%)

20(26.7%)

0.005

7(10.4%)

27(19.1%)

0.08

Influenza vaccine (current)

121(58.2%)

44(57.9%)

77(58.7%)

0.91

36(53.7%)

85(60.3%)

0.38

Pneumococcal vaccine

40(19.23%)

30(22.6%)

10(13.3%)

0.08

13(19.4%)

27(19.1%)

0.97

  1. (p <0.1 shown in bold)