Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies, patient populations, topic and results of risk of bias assessment

From: Seasonal influenza vaccination in patients with COPD: a systematic literature review

Reference

(Country)

Study design

(population)

Influenza season

(setting)

Mean (SD) Agea

Gender, % malea

N total

Outcome

Potential bias identified & expected impact (Quality assessmentb)

Randomised controlled trials

Chuaychoo et al., 2010 [31] (Thailand)

Open label RCT

(Patients with confirmed COPD)

2006–2007

(1 hospital COPD clinic)

73 (9)

90.7%

75

Immunogenicity

Safety

No placebo-controlled group; open-label design; self-reported safety outcomes (LOW)

Gorse et al., 2004c [32] (US)

Placebo-controlled RCT

(Patients ≥ 50 years with confirmed COPD)

1998–1999

(20 Veterans affairs medical centres)

67.9 (8.5)/67.8 (8.2)

98.0/98.4%

2,215

Immunogenicity

Serum titres tested in 61 subject; no placebo-controlled/unvaccinated group (ACCEPTABLE)

Gorse et al., 2003c [39]

  

2,215

Safety

Self-reported safety outcomes (ACCEPTABLE)

Kositanont et al., 2004d [40] (Thailand)

Placebo-controlled RCT (2 doses 1 month apart)

(Patients with confirmed COPD)

1997–1998

(1 hospital COPD clinic)

67.6 (8)/69.1 (7)

95.2/93.7%

123

Immunogenicity

Efficacy

Self-reported safety outcomes

(ACCEPTABLE)

Wongsurakiat et al. 2004ad[35]

   

125

Immunogenicity

Efficacy

 

Wongsurakiat et al., 2004bd[38]

   

125

Safety

 

Gorse et al., 1997 [33]

(US)

RCT (Outpatients with confirmed COPD)

(Veterans affairs medical centres)

65.2 (2.1)

100%

29

Immunogenicity

Safety

Small sample size; no estimate of study power; limited information on patient characteristics; males only (LOW)

Observational studies

Nath et al., 2014 [34]

(Australia)

Prospective cohort study

(Patients with confirmed COPD)

2010

(outpatient clinics 1 hospital)

66.2 (11.0)/54.3 (14.5)

65.0/57.1%

34

Immunogenicity

Small sample size; no estimate of study power; significant differences between groups at baseline; serological response to only one vaccine strain (LOW)

Chen et al., 2013e [45]

(Taiwan)

Retrospective, Database study (Patients ≥ 55 years with COPD diagnosed using ICD-9 codes)

2000–2007

(Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Dataset)

-

58.9/53.4%

25,609

Effectiveness

Retrospective design; no estimate of study power (ACCEPTABLE)

Sung et al., 2014e [46]

≥55

58.7/60.8%

7,722

Effectiveness

Retrospective design; estimate of study power (ACCEPTABLE)

Menon et al., 2008 [43]

(India)

Self-controlled case series

(Male patients with confirmed COPD)

2004–2006 (outpatient department 1 hospital)

64.8 (8)

100%

87

Effectiveness

Small sample size; no estimate of study power; males only; comparison of different influenza seasons (LOW)

Schembri et al., 2009 [42] (UK)

Retrospective, database study (Patients ≥ 40 year registered in the data base with COPD)

1988–2006

(The Health Improvement Network)

-

42.4/42.8%

40,741

Effectiveness

Retrospective design; no estimate of study power (ACCEPTABLE)

Vila-Córcoles et al., 2008 [41] (Spain)

Prospective cohort study

(Community-dwelling ≥65 years olds registered with COPD in clinic record)

2002–2005

(8 urban health centres)

74.1 (6.8)/76.3 (6.9)

73.7/74.5%

1,298

Effectiveness

Significant differences between groups at baseline; no estimate of study power (ACCEPTABLE)

Ting et al., 2011 [36] (UK)

Retrospective matched cohort study (Patients with confirmed COPD)

2005 (6 general practices)

68 (37–89)

64.8%

586

Safety

Retrospective design; sample size calculations performed but details not presented; limited information on patient characteristics; matched pairs of patients, but no results of matching (LOW)

Montserrat-Capdevila et al., 2014 [44] (Spain)

Retrospective cohort study

(Patients registered with confirmed COPD)

2001–2002

(1 hospital)

75.6 (11.7)/57.1 (18.2)

65.2/60.5%

1,323

Effectiveness

Retrospective design; no estimate of study power (ACCEPTABLE)

Tata et al., 2003 [37] (UK)

Database study with self-controlled case series (Random sample of patients with COPD using OXMIS and READ codes)

1991–1994 (Clinical Practice Research Datalink, previously General Practice Research Database)

65–79

63%

2,100

Safety

Retrospective design; limited information on patient characteristics (ACCEPTABLE)

Wang et al., 2003 [12] (Taiwan)

Retrospective population-based cohort study (>65 years old patients with COPD identified using ICD-9 mortality codes)

2001

No data for patients with COPD

102,698 elderly

Effectiveness

Retrospective database design; no estimate of study power; COPD identified from mortality ICD-9 codes; Reason for risk status not known; limited information on patient characteristics (LOW)

  1. N number of subjects, RCT randomised controlled trial, SD standard deviation, UK United Kingdom, US United States, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ICD-9 international classification of disease version 9. Confirmed COPD, COPD confirmed according to spirometry criteria
  2. aAge and gender presented as vaccinated/unvaccinated or controls
  3. bStudy quality according to Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) checklists [21]. Studies classified as of low or acceptable quality
  4. cGorse et al., 2004 and Gorse et al., 2003 describe the same RCT
  5. dKositanont et al., 2004, Wongsurakiat et al., 2004a and Wongsurakiat et al., 2004b describe the same RCT, with minor discrepancies in patient characteristics
  6. eIn the study of Sung et al., 2014 a subpopulation of Chen et al., 2013 is used