Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of FISH, IHC, qRT-PCR, NGS and NanoString regarding costs, procedural difficulty and resolution

From: Detection of ALK fusion transcripts in FFPE lung cancer samples by NanoString technology

  

FISH

IHC

qRT-PCR

NGS

NanoString

Costs

Overal reagents costs

*/**

***

**/***

*

**/***

 

Hardware & software costs

**

***

**

*

*

Procedural difficulty

RNA input required

NA

NA

*

***

**

 

Poor quality

samples

*/**

**/***

*

*/**

**/***

 

Hands on time

*/**

*/**

**

*/**

***

 

Run time and results analysis

**

**

**

*

**/***

 

Interpretation of results

*/**

*/**

**

***

**

 

Throughput

*

*/**

**

***

**/***

Resolution

Accuracy at low concentrations

NA

NA

**

*/**

***

 

Quantitative precision

*/**

*/**

**

***

***

 

Variants detection

*

*

**

***

**/***

  1. *-worse option; **-moderate option; *** - best option: NA Not applicable