Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline features of study population

From: Effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with interstitial lung disease of different etiology: a multicenter prospective study

Baseline characteristics

Overall

Center of provenience

p

Setting of PR program

p

Aa (n. 20)

Bb (n. 21)

In (n. 30)

Out (n. 11)

Age (years)

66.9 ± 10.9

67.8 ± 9.7

65.4 ± 11.1

.74

70.3 ± 15.7

62.4 ± 7.1

0.12

Gender (males: females)

27: 14

13: 7

14: 7

.99

21: 9

8: 3

0.99

BMI (kg/m2)

28.1 ± 3.4

27.8 ± 2.4

28.3 ± 1.1

.84

27.6 ± 7.4

29.3 ± 1

0.46

Diagnosis (IPF: non IPF)

26: 15

13: 7

13: 8

.99

18: 12

8: 3

0.72

Smoking history (yes: no)

30: 11

16: 4

14: 7

.48

21: 9

9: 2

0.69

GAP index -for IPF only-

3.74 ± 1.69

4.14 ± 2.19

3.24 ± 1.15

.11

4.36 ± 3.19

3.24 ± 1

0.345

Inpatients (in: out)

30: 11

15: 5

15: 6

.99

O2 therapy (yes: no)

12: 29

5: 15

7: 14

.73

10: 20

2: 9

.46

O2 therapy (continuous: during effort)

8: 4

3: 1

5: 3

.99

7: 3

1: 1

.99

Arterial pO2 (mmHg)

68 ± 12

70 ± 10

66 ± 7

.14

64 ± 14

71 ± 3

.11

Arterial pCO2 (mmHg)

37 ± 4

38 ± 5

37 ± 2

.4

37 ± 4

37 ± 1

.99

FVC (% predicted)

74.5 ± 21.4

72.4 ± 16.4

75.8 ± 7.4

.39

70.4 ± 16.4

77.8 ± 8.4

.16

FEV1 (% predicted)

78.7 ± 20.7

79.6 ± 19.6

77.4 ± 21.7

.74

72.6 ± 19.6

79.4 ± 12.7

.29

DLCO (% predicted)

45.5 ± 20.9

43.3 ± 21.2

46.9 ± 19.5

.57

42.4 ± 19.2

47.9 ± 12.5

.38

  1. aCenter A = “Don Gnocchi” Institute, Firenze, Italy
  2. bCenter B = “Villa Pineta” Rehabilitation Hospital in Pavullo n/F, Modena, Italy. Continuous variables are indicated as mean ± standard deviation, non continuous as n