Skip to main content

Table 4 Physicians’ perspectives on MART

From: Physician perspectives on the burden and management of asthma in six countries: The Global Asthma Physician Survey (GAPS)

% of physicians giving response

Total

n=1286

Canada

n=248

France

n=112

Germany

n=180

Australia

n=269

China

n=281

Japan

n=196

Reasons for prescribing MART

 Patients with severe symptoms (daytime/night-time symptoms ≥4 days/week)

35

3

15

11

1

79

3

 Patients with moderate symptoms (daytime/night-time symptoms 2–3 days/week)

33

5

16

10

1

72

6

 Patients with/at risk of exacerbations

30

7

12

5

9

51

29

 Greater convenience for the patient as only one inhaler is required

22

27

32

15

28

29

6

 Patient factors (knowledge/understanding, compliance, age)

20

54

5

17

65

-

29

Reasons for not prescribing MARTa

 Patients with more mild symptoms

38

10

8

4

13

64

6

 Patients with poor adherence

25

13

34

18

18

29

18

 Patients with severe symptoms (daytime/night-time symptoms ≥4 days/week)

19

14

14

17

18

25

5

 Patients with lots of co-morbidities

14

18

3

16

16

15

10

 Patient factors (knowledge/understanding, compliance, age)

10

30

14

10

37

-

21

Prescription of SABA/bronchodilator with MART

 Always

19

13

27

10

6

33

3

 Most of the time

30

19

29

29

23

42

18

 Some of the time

42

55

37

52

50

23

63

 Never

8

13

7

9

21

1

13

Reasons for prescribing SABAs / bronchodilators with MARTb

 Patients want an extra reliever to feel safer

35

14

28

36

14

59

8

 Patient familiarity with short-acting-beta medicine

32

19

13

13

18

59

8

 Patient convenience – having an extra reliever on hand

27

4

13

5

3

56

2

 Patients are accustomed to having an extra reliever

20

5

19

6

6

35

8

MART dosing instructions provided to pharmacy

 Don’t write anything different to normal dosing

32

25

10

29

23

38

37

 Write Maintenance Plus Reliever language as a standard choice

26

19

27

8

18

41

15

 Have to create my own text noting maintenance frequency and PRN

21

35

54

33

36

1

24

 Write ICS/LABA as both maintenance and reliever

15

18

7

13

20

16

17

MART dosing instructions provided to patients

 Verbal instructions to use the ICS/LABA as relief as well as maintenance

87

89

91

83

73

93

82

 Written instructions to use the ICS/LABA as relief as well as maintenance

59

45

84

81

66

71

24

 Verbal instructions to use the ICS/LABA as relief but not maintenance

14

7

36

20

6

16

6

 Written instructions to use the ICS/LABA as relief but not maintenance

6

4

30

18

3

1

1

Time/effort required for MART prescribing vs. other maintenance medicationsc

 Much more time and effort

14

4

1

6

5

24

11

 Somewhat more time and effort

40

32

21

38

40

45

42

 About the same

29

38

68

43

29

19

20

 Somewhat less time and effort

13

19

9

9

18

7

21

 Much less time and effort

5

7

0

4

7

5

6

  1. Questions regarding MART administration were asked only of physicians who had prescribed MART. ‘-’ represents values of 0% or <1%. For questions with more than five possible responses, the five reasons with the highest overall response rates (with overall response rates of ≥10%) have been included. Percentage values within categories may sum to <100% or >100% due to rounding and weightings applied
  2. ICS inhaled corticosteroid, LABA long-acting β2-agonist, MART maintenance and reliever therapy, PRN pro re nata (as needed), SABA short-acting β2-agonist
  3. aAmong physicians responding yes to there being situations where MART would not be prescribed: Total (n=805), Canada (n=151), France (n=70), Germany (n=93), Australia (n=157), China (n=259), Japan (n=75); bAmong physicians reporting prescribing SABA with MART some of the time, most of the time, or always: Total (n=1127), Canada (n=211), France (n=104), Germany (n=165), Australia (n=209), China (n=277), Japan (n=161); cExcluding physicians responding ‘Don’t know’ or ‘Refuse’: Total (n=1283), Canada (n=248), France (n=112), Germany (n=179), Australia (n=269), China (n=281), Japan (n=194)