Skip to main content

Table 2 Alterations in clinical/inflammatory characteristics and inflammatory phenotypes during changes in asthma treatment (CIT study)

From: Effects of treatment changes on asthma phenotype prevalence and airway neutrophil function

 

A) Start or increase ICS (n = 11)

B) Stop or decrease ICS (n = 10)

C) All (n = 21) when assessed during:

Visit 1

(suboptimal Rx)

Visit 2

(optimised Rx)

Δ

Visit 1

(optimised Rx)

Visit 2

(suboptimal Rx)

Δ

Suboptimal Rx

Optimised Rx

Δ

Female (%)

5 (45%)

–

–

7 (70%)

–

–

12 (57%)

–

–

Age

36 (33, 43)

–

–

44 (27, 56)

–

–

37.0 (31, 55)

–

–

Atopy

10 (91%)

–

–

10 (100%)

–

–

20 (95%)

–

–

ICS dose (μg, budesonide equiv.)

0 (0, 140)

1000 (800, 1000)

1000**

775 (500, 850)

0 (0, 500)

−775**

0 (0, 375)

800 (500, 1000)

800***

ACQ7

1.71 (1.14, 2.14)

0.71 (0.57, 1.07)

−1.00**

0.57 (0.54, 0.90)

1.22 (0.89, 1.82)

0.65**

1.71 (1.07, 2.07)

0.57 (0.57, 1.00)

−1.14***

FEV1% predicted

71.5 (68.2, 82.6)

79.3 (69.5, 82.4)

7.8

82.1 (76.2, 92.4)

85.5 (73.0, 90.9)

3.4

75.6 (69.6, 86.4)

79.3 (74.1, 85.8)

3.7*

FEV1/FVC

0.65 (0.63, 0.68)

0.71 (0.59, 0.78)

0.06

0.74 (0.65, 0.83)

0.73 (0.63, 0.83)

−0.01

0.67 (0.64, 0.76)

0.71 (0.65, 0.78)

0.04

BDR (post-bronchodilator reversibility)% change

15.4 (9.3, 21.8)

11.1 (8.0, 15.5)

−4.3**

5.0 (1, 8.6)

7.7 (1.8, 11.9)

2.7

11.4 (5.3, 16.2)

8.6 (3.9, 12.5)

−2.8**

FENO (ppb)

124 (87–188)

84 (26.6–110)

−40**

44.0 (21.0, 74.0)

62.0 (34.0, 98.0)

18*

89.0 (47.0, 165.5)

51.0 (23.8, 90.0)

−38**

EA (%)

9 (82%)

6 (55%)

−3 (−27%)

2 (20%)

4 (40%)

2 (20%)

13 (61.9%)

8 (38.1%)

−5 (−23.8%)

NEA (%) of which:

2 (18%)

5 (45%)

3 (27%)

8 (80%)

6 (60%)

−2 (−20%)

8 (38.1%)

13 (61.9%)

5 (23.8%)

NA (%)

1 (9%)

1 (9%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

3 (30%)

3 (30%)

4 (19.0%)

1 (4.8%)

−3 (−14.3%)

PGA (%)

1 (9%)

4 (36%)

3 (27%)

8 (80%)

3 (30%)

−5 (−50%)

4 (19.0%)

12 (57.1%)

8 (38.1%)

Sputum eosinophils %

6.9 (2.2, 17.2)

3.1 (0.9, 9.1)

−5.4

1.4 (0.6, 1.7)

0.9 (0, 7.4)

−0.5

4.4 (0.7, 15.3)

1.5 (0.8, 4.8)

−2.9

Sputum neutrophils %

27.4 (9.3, 43.7)

30.4 (17.4, 38.7)

3

38.0 (14.5, 45.1)

43.9 (18.9, 63.9)

5.9

35.8 (14, 53.9)

34.5 (17.3, 43.2)

−1.3

TCC/ml

2.33 (0.94, 3.08)

2.08 (1.80, 3.25)

−0.25

1.23 (0.95, 2.07)

0.89 (0.70, 1.47)

−0.34

1.26 (0.74, 2.44)

1.8 (1.17, 3.07)

−0.54

Viability % (non-squamous cells)

69.4 (56.6, 83.1)

78.8 (67.0, 84.4)

9.4

70.9 (63.5, 78.1)

80.2 (65.5, 86.9)

9.3

73.8 (60.3, 85.4)

76.0 (64.0, 81.7)

2.2

Sputum IL-8 (ng/ml)

2.19 (0.58, 2.53)

1.94 (1.19, 4.26)

−0.25

2.53 (1.35, 3.85)

2.05 (1.02, 3.39)

−0.48

2.19 (0.93, 3.11)

2.11 (1.28, 3.57)

−0.08

Sputum MMP-9

411 (259, 2490)

637 (421, 1289)

226

1160 (295, 1584)

1293 (326, 2003)

133

666 (277, 2042)

1094 (376, 1408)

428

NE detected (%)

1 (9%)

0 (0%)

−1 (−9%)

0 (0%)

3 (30%)

3 (30%)

4 (19%)

0 (0%)

−4 (−19%)

Endotoxin (EU/ml)

2027 (1172, 2342)

1235 (546, 1769)

−792*

2227 (720, 4087)

1879 (1477, 3054)

−348

1894 (1354, 2577)

1361 (559, 2650)

−533

  1. ICS dose – average daily dose ICS over recording period in μg budesonide equivalent. Data expressed as number (percentage) or median (IQR). Δ difference between median values of paired groups. ***p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05 when compared with matched group
  2. A and B represent the data derived from the assessments as described (n = 11 go from sub-optimised to optimised, n = 10 from optimised to sub-optimised). C represents the data from all 21 CIT participants when data are stratified according to their treatment status