Skip to main content

Table 1 Interfaces performance

From: Comparative bench study evaluation of different infant interfaces for non-invasive ventilation

RR 50

ET

Respireo

P

RR 60

ET

Respireo

p

Swingtrigger (cmH2O)

1.82 ± 0.1

0.83 ± 0.08

< 0.001

 

2.75 ± 0.12

0.78 ± 0.09

< 0.001

PTPtrigger (cmH2O/s)

0.09 ± 0.01

0.06 ± 0.01

< 0.001

 

0.14 ± 0.01

0.05 ± 0.02

< 0.001

PTP300 (cmH2O/s)

1.8 ± 0.11

1.61 ± 0.19

NS

 

1.7 ± 0.1

1.7 ± 0.18

NS

PTP500index (%)

55%

56%

NS

 

48%

50%

< 0.05

  1. Performance evaluation of the endotracheal tube (ET) and the new infant nasal mask (Respireo) in terms of Trigger pressure drop (Swingtrigger), Inspiratory pressure–time product (PTP trigger), Pressure-Time Product at 300(PTP300), and PTP500 index at two respiratory rates (RR 50 and RR 60 breaths/min)
  2. Values are mean ± SD
Back to article page

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

ISSN: 1471-2466

Contact us