Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of positive rates between three different treatment methods of specimens from different puncture sites

From: Values of different specimen preparation methods for the diagnosis of lung cancer by endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration

Variables

Number

% Total Positive

histopathology

% Positive

TS

% Positive

LBC

% Positive

P Value

ALL

154

77.3(119)

68.8(106)

65.6(101)

60.4(93)

0.29a, 0.01b

Anatomic site

Trachea mediastinal

lymph nodes

ā€ƒ(2Rā€‰+ā€‰4Rā€‰+ā€‰4ā€‰L)

66

87.9(58)

78.8(52)

75.8(50)

71.2(47)

0.60a, 0.11b

ā€ƒ7 group

55

72.7(40)

65.5(36)

60.0(33)

54.5(30)

0.51a, 0.23b

Hilar lymph node

ā€ƒ(10R,Lā€‰+ā€‰11R,Lā€‰+ā€‰12R)

19

42.1(8)

31.6(6)

31.6 (6)

26.3(5)

0.92a, 0.77b

ā€ƒMass

14

92.9(13)

85.7(12)

85.7(12)

78.6(11)

0.84a, 0.75b

  1. TS Traditional smears, LBC liquid-based cytology
  2. a: Comparison of positive rates among three single pathological treatment type
  3. b: Comparison of positive rates between combination of the three treatment types and any single pathological treatment type