Skip to main content

Table 2 Assessment of risk of bias of the included randomised controlled trials

From: Risk of wheezing and asthma exacerbation in children treated with paracetamol versus ibuprofen: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Author, year

Random sequence generation

Allocation concealment

Blinding of participants and personnel

Blinding of outcome assessment

Incomplete outcome data

Selective reporting

Exposure assessmenta

Outcome assessmenta

Lesko et al. 1995 [19]

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

High risk

High risk

Luo et al. 2017 [22]

Low risk

Low risk

High risk

High risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

McIntyre and Hull 1996 [23]

Low risk

High risk

High risk

High risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Sheehan et al. 2016 [24]

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

High risk

Low risk

Unclear

Low risk

Wong et al. 2001 [25]

Low risk

High risk

Low risk

High risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

  1. a Exposure and outcome assessment were considered low risk if the information was obtained from medical records or directly recorded by the investigators, and high risk if it was self-reported by the parents or guardians of the children
  2. The other items of the risk of bias were classified as low or high risk following the Cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing the bias in randomized trials [16]