Skip to main content

Table 2 Network changes. Network Changes at Time 2 = 3 months post intervention (n = 27–3 dropped out)

From: Findings from a pilot randomised trial of a social network self-management intervention in COPD

Baseline

Extending Networks

Network engagement

  

Study Participa nt Number

Type of network At Baseline

Additional new activities

Type of network at 3 months follow up

Online

Reflection on existing support

Increased contact with existing groups/people

Additional new network members

Change within network Score

002

Family centred

0

family Centred

0

1

1

1

Addition of less frequent contact with distance relatives and a new close friend, seen at least once a week.

3/5

003

Family Centred

0

Declined to repeat the social circles

0

0

0

0

n/a

0/5

005

Very Small network (4 members only)

0

Very Small network (4 members only)

0

0

0

0

Very severe COPD and hospitalised during the study.

0

008

Small (8 members)

0

Small (8 members)

0

0

0

0

Very severe COPD and hospitalised during the study.

0

009

Small (8 members)

0

Friend supported

0

1

1

1

4 additional network members, greater involvement with the church, reduction in frequency of seeing health providers.

3/5

014

Family centred (18 members)

0

Family centred (18 members)

0

0

0

0

Carer or her grandchildren, no capacity to diversify.

0

015

Very small

0

Very small

0

0

0

0

Did not wish to diversify.

0

018

Diverse

0

Diverse

0

0

0

0

Already diverse.

0

019

Diverse

0

Diverse

0

1

1

1

Movement post intervention – 2 people left the group, 2 people joined, 3 people became closer and more valued. More value and time attributed to groups.

3/5

021

Very Diverse

0

Very diverse

0

0

0

0

No movement already very diverse network

0

022

Family Centred

0

Friend Supported

0

1

1

0

Valued friends became closer as their support was helpful.

2/5

025

Very small

1

Diverse

0

1

0

0

Joined 3 weekly health related groups

2/5

027

Diverse

0

Diverse

0

1

0

0

Maintained groups and friends- but saw less of her daughter and son in law

1/5

030

Family Centred

1

Diverse

0

1

1

1

Addition of 3 more friends/ neighbours and joined 2 groups.

4/5

033

Friend centred

1

Diverse

0

1

1

0

Increased number of groups and group frequency

3/5

037

Family supported

0

Declined follow up

0

0

0

0

n/a

0

040

Family Centred

0

Family centred

0

0

0

0

No change- had been unwell in the past 3 months since GENIE

0

041

Family and Friend Centred

0

Family and Friend Centred

0

0

0

0

Declined to discuss at follow up.

0

043

Small

1

Family and Friend Supported

0

1

1

0

Increase in regular friends visiting, and joined an exercise group.

3/5

045

Family Centred

0

Declined follow up

0

0

0

0

n/a

0

047

Family Centred

0

Family Centred

0

0

0

0

No change as admission and been unwell over the 3 months follow up period.

0

050

Small

1

small

1

1

0

0

However, this person liked to have a small network due to social anxiety and supported the setup of groups for others and joined a new exercise group

3/5

052

Friend Centred

0

Friend Centred

0

1

1

0

No change – movement in friends – but within the existing network.

2/5

053

Friend Centred

0

Friend Centred

0

1

1

0

Increased health engagement with services and decreased family reliance, however remained in a friend centric network.

2/5

055

Family Centred

0

Family Centred

0

0

0

0

Awaiting lung transplant, currently reliant on family.

0

058

Friend and family supported

1

Diverse

0

1

1

0

Many peripheral friends and addition of 2 health related groups

3/5

060

Friend Centred

0

Diverse

0

1

1

1

Increase of frequency of group meeting and addition of 2 friends

3/5

  1. Overall 11 people increased their network frequency and members enough to move up a group. 13 people remained the same. Note that 4 of these people already had diverse or very diverse networks. Time 2 refers to changes 3 months after the intervention