Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of the studies included in the systematic review. For periodontal outcomes see main text

From: Effect of periodontal therapy on COPD outcomes: a systematic review

First author/year/Country [Ref.]

Study design

Study population

Study groups

Periodontal interventions

Outcomes/associations

Follow up period

Results

Das/2017/India [27]

Randomized controlled trial

35 COPD patients with CP

Periodontal treatment, n = 17

No treatment, n = 18

Mouth scaling and root planning with hand instruments versus no treatment

SGRQ

1 year

Treatment group: improvement in the SGRQ “activity” subscore (53.68 ± 16.37 vs. 38.20 ± 13.18; p = 0.005)

Control group: no change in SGRQ

Madalli/2016/India [33]

Before-after treatment prospective cohort

30 COPD patients with CP

N/A

Supragingival scaling

FEV1/FVC

3–5 months

No significant improvement in FEV1/FVC

Shen/2016/Taiwan [30]

Retrospective propensity-matched case–control

11,124 COPD patients with CP

Periodontal treatment, n = 5562

No treatment, n = 5562

Subgingival curettage and root planning and/or invasive periodontal flap surgery versus no treatment

ER visits for COPD exacerbation

Hospitalizations for adverse respiratory events

ICU admissions

All-cause mortality

5 years from inclusion

Occurrence of an adverse respiratory event

Death

Withdrawal from the insurance system

ER visits per 100 person-years for COPD exacerbation: 2.54 ( treatment group) versus 2.88 (control group); adjusted IRR of 0.86 (95% CI 0.78–0.94; p < 0.001)

Hospitalizations for adverse respiratory events per 100 person-years: 2.75 (treatment group) versus 3.65 (control group); adjusted IRR 0.74 (95% CI 0.69–0.80; p < 0.001)

ICU admissions per 100 person-years: 0.66 (treatment group) versus 0.75 (control group); adjusted IRR 0.84 (95% CI 0.75–0.94; p < 0.01)

All-cause mortality per 100 person-years: 1.81 (treatment group) versus 2.87 (control group); adjusted rate ratio 0.57 (95% CI 0.52–0.62; p < 0.001)

Zhou/2014/China [29]

Randomized controlled trial

30 moderate-to-severe COPD patients

Supragingival scaling, root planning and maintenance care (SRP group), n = 20

Supragingival scaling and maintenance care (scaling group), n = 20

No treatment (control group), n = 20

SRP versus scaling versus no treatment

FEV1 (% predicted), FEV1/FVC

Proportion of frequent exacerbations (≥ 2/year)

2 years

Control group lung function compared to baseline

Lower FEV1 at 2 years (56.3 ± 16.4 vs. 51.6 ± 18.4, p < 0.05)

Lower FEV1/FVC at 1 and 2 years (0.55 ± 0.11 vs. 0.54 ± 0.11 vs. 0.53 ± 0.11; p < 0.05)

SRP versus control group

Higher FEV1 at 1 year (55.9 ± 16 vs. 53.6 ± 18.7; p < 0.05) and at 2 years (57.1 ± 19 vs. 51.6 ± 18.4; p < 0.05)

Higher FEV1/FVC at 1 year (0.59 ± 0.09 vs. 0.54 ± 0.11; p < 0.05) and at 2 years (0.57 ± 0.10 vs. 0.53 ± 0.11; p < 0.05)

Scaling versus control group:

Higher FEV1 at 1 year (59.6 ± 17.1 vs. 53.6 ± 18.7, p < 0.005)

Higher FEV1/FVC at 2 years (0.56 ± 0.11 vs. 0.53 ± 0.11, p < 0.05)

Proportion of frequent exacerbations in SRP versus scaling versus control group

30% versus 15.8% versus 66.7%; p < 0.004

Adjusted OR for frequent exacerbations

SRP group: 0.29, (95% CI 0.10–0.84; p = 0.02)

Scaling group: 0.004 (95% CI 0.003–0.64; p = 0.02)

No differences in lung function and exacerbations between the 2 treatment groups

Kucukcoskun/2013/

Turkey [31]

Prospective case–control

40 COPD patients with CP and ≥ 1 exacerbation in the previous year

Periodontal treatment, n = 20

No treatment, n = 20

Full-mouth scaling and root planning with hand instruments and ultrasonic devices

Exacerbation frequency in 12 months

Number of hospitalizations

12 months

Exacerbation frequency per patient-year: 1.95 (treatment group) versus 3.25 (control group)

Exacerbation frequency decreased in treatment group (3 ± 1.83 vs. 1.95 ± 1.46; p = 0.01) but remained unchanged in the control group (3.5 ± 4.62 vs. 3.25 ± 3.35; p = NS)

Hospitalizations increased from 4/year to 7/year in the treatment group and from 10/year to 12/year in the control group

Agado/2012/USA [28]

Randomized controlled trial

30 COPD patients with CP

Periodontal debridement with ultrasonic device, n = 10

Periodontal debridement with hand instruments, n = 10

No treatment, n = 10

Periodontal debridement

SGRQ-A

5-point Likert scale of health status self-perception

7-item illness questionnaire

4–6 weeks

No improvement in SGRQ-A, health status self-perception and illness questionnaire post treatment

Liu/2012/China [32]

Cross-sectional

392 COPD patients

Frequent exacerbators (≥ 2 events/year), n = 183

Infrequent exacerbators (< 2 events/year), n = 209

Supragingival scaling

 ≥ 1/year, n = 15

 < 1/year, n = 377

Correlation between periodontal/oral health and its treatment and frequency of COPD exacerbations

N/A

Risk factors for frequent exacerbations

 ≤ 25 remaining teeth (adjusted OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.03–2.77; p = 0.04)

 < 1 daily brushing frequency (adjusted OR 4.19, 95% CI 1.44–12.1; p = 0.008)

  1. COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, CP chronic periodontitis, ER emergency room, GOLD global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease, ICU intensive care unit, IRR incidence rate ratio, N/A not applicable, OR odds ratio, SGRQ St. George Respiratory Questionnaire, SGRQ-A American English modified SGRQ, SRP scaling and root planning