Skip to main content

Table 5 Prognostic factors of acute exacerbation of systemic autoimmune disease-associated interstitial lung disease by univariate analysis

From: A systematic review of the incidence, risk factors and prognosis of acute exacerbation of systemic autoimmune disease-associated interstitial lung disease

Potential prognostic factorsa

Studies (n)b

Effect estimates (95% confidence interval)c

Demographic features

Age (at acute exacerbation)

Meta-analysis (n = 3)

MD 0.41 (− 8.74 to 9.57) (year)

Manfredi [55]

MD 6.55 (− 4.40 to 17.5) (year)d

Liang [54]

MD 0.00 (− 6.49 to 6.49) (year) e

Enomoto [50]

HR 1.03 (p = 0.50) (year)

Sex (men)

Enomoto [50]

HR 3.19 (p = 0.29)

Ishikawa [53]

OR 0.50 (0.03–8.95)

Liang [54]

OR 1.85 (0.66–5.17)

Singh [60]

RR 1.33 (0.32–5.58)

Smoking history (ever-smoking vs. non-smoking)

Singh [60]

RR 1.83 (0.46–7.25)

Liang [54]

OR 1.22 (0.37–4.07)

Parambil [58]

OR 4.20 (0.12–152.0)

Pulmonary function (before acute exacerbation)

FVC

Meta-analysis (n = 3)

MD − 5.95 (− 13.9 to 1.99) (% of predicted value)

Enomoto [50]

HR 1.07 (p = 0.35) (%of predicted value)

Underlying radiological features

UIP pattern on HRCT

Meta-analysis (n = 3)

OR 0.70 (0.24–2.08)

Manfredi [55]

RR 2.00 (0.37–10.9)

Singh [60]

RR 0.42 (0.03–5.78)

Laboratory findings (at acute exacerbation)

PaO2/FiO2

Cao [49]

HR 0.989 (0.985–0.994)

Enomoto [50]

HR 0.99 (p = 0.18)

Manfredi [55]

MD − 18.3 (− 77.4 to 40.9)

LDH

Cao [49]

HR 1.004 (1.002–1.005) (U/L)

Enomoto [50]

HR 1.001 (p = 0.63) (IU/L)

Liang [54]

MD 24.2 (− 86.2 to 134.5) (U/L)

  1. Bold in text indicating statistical significance
  2. FVC, forced vital capacity; HR, hazard ratio; HRCT, high resolution computed tomography; ILD, interstitial lung disease; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; MD, mean difference; OR, odds ratio; PaO2/FiO2, partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio; RR, risk ratio; UIP, usual interstitial pneumonia
  3. aAny clinical information that was reported in at least three studies
  4. bWhere combined results were presented, it was designated as meta-analysis, otherwise each study was presented
  5. cMD was calculated as a difference between decedents and survivors
  6. dAge at ILD diagnosis
  7. eUnknown point in time