Table 3 Cross-validated performance of variables analyzed to predict weaning outcome—mean values derived from the test sets

Post-SBT

P_aCO₂ on MV

78 (56–93)

73 (58–85)

61 (47–73)

87 (75–94)

75 (63–85)

3.1 (1.7–5.5)

0.3 (0.7–0.1)

11.1

0.68

0.50

VR

73 (50–89)

71 (55–84)

56 (43–69)

84 (72–91)

72 (59–82)

2.6 (1.5–4.4)

0.4 (0.8–0.2)

7.2

0.63

0.42

LTC_dyn

68 (46–85)

71 (55–84)

54 (40–67)

82 (71–89)

70 (57–81)

2.4 (1.4–4.1)

0.4 (0.8–0.3)

7.7

0.60

0.38

MP

66 (44–84)

64 (48–78)

48 (36–53)

79 (67–87)

65 (52–76)

1.8 (1.1–3.0)

0.5 (1.0–0.3)

4.5

0.55

0.28

PBW-MP

68 (45–86)

68 (52–81)

53 (40–66)

81 (69–89)

68 (55–79)

2.3 (1.3–4.1)

0.5 (0.9–0.3)

5.6

0.59

0.35

LTC_dyn-MP

73 (51–88)

67 (54–80)

53 (41–65)

83 (71–90)

69 (56–80)

2.3 (1.4–3.9)

0.4 (0.8–0.2)

7.3

0.61

0.38

PI_rs^1.0

74 (52–89)

73 (58–86)

58 (45–71)

85 (73–92)

73 (61–84)

2.9 (1.6–4.1)

0.4 (0.7–0.2)

11.3

0.65

0.45

PI_rs^2.0

78 (56–92)

76 (61–88)

63 (49–75)

87 (75–94)

77 (65–86)

3.4 (1.9–6.2)

0.3 (0.6–0.1)

15.3

0.70

0.52

Pre-weaning completion

P_aCO₂ on MV

77 (55–92)

76 (60–87)

62 (48–74)

87 (75–93)

76 (64–86)

3.2 (1.8–5.8)

0.3 (0.7–0.1)

11.6

0.69

0.51

VR

70 (47–88)

66 (50–79)

52 (39–64)

81 (69–90)

67 (55–78)

2.1 (1.3–3.5)

0.5 (0.9–0.2)

4.8

0.59

0.35

LTC_dyn

69 (44–88)

76 (61–87)

56 (41–69)

86 (75–92)

74 (62–84)

3.2 (1.7–6.3)

0.4 (0.8–0.2)

9.4

0.61

0.43

MP

70 (48–87)

60 (44–74)

48 (37–59)

80 (67–89)

63 (51–75)

1.8 (1.1–2.9)

0.5 (1.0–0.2)

3.8

0.57

0.29

PBW-MP

68 (45–86)

67 (51–80)

51 (39–64)

81 (68–89)

67 (55–78)

2.1 (1.2–3.5)

0.5 (0.9–0.3)

4.6

0.58

0.33

LTC_dyn-MP

74 (53–88)

77 (62–89)

62 (47–75)

86 (75–92)

76 (64–86)

3.3 (1.8–6.2)

0.3 (0.7–0.2)

18.5

0.67

0.49

PI_rs^1.0

82 (61–94)

81 (66–91)

68 (53–81)

90 (78–95)

81 (70–90)

4.4 (2.3–8.5)

0.2 (0.6–0.1)

42.9

0.74

0.61

PI_rs^2.0

88 (67–97)

83 (69–93)

73 (58–84)

93 (81–97)

85 (74–92)

5.9 (2.8–13)

0.2 (0.5–0.1)

52.8

0.79

0.68