Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
6 Nov 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
22 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kevin Schwartzman |
4 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - laurent Nicod |
23 Sep 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Anil Pooran |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
23 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
23 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kevin Schwartzman |
19 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Anil Pooran |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
19 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
1 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kevin Schwartzman |
9 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Anil Pooran |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
9 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
5 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Anil Pooran |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
5 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
22 Feb 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
22 Feb 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2466-10-7 |
You can find further information about peer review here.