Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of prospective analysis of spontaneous sputum samples.

From: Assessing airway inflammation in clinical practice – experience with spontaneous sputum analysis

Question

 

Diagnosis confirmed

Analysis had impact

Diagnosis faster

Diagn. more economic

Success of treatment

New clue for diagn.

Category according to change in analog scales of diagnoses

n

mm

mm

mm

mm

mm

mm

Overall

75

80 (52;94)

85 (50;92)

85 (52;95)

50 (45;85)

55 (50;87)

10 (2;50)

C (confirmed, more confident)

48

90 (80;100)

90 (65;97)

90 (85;100)

50 (50;90)

80 (50;90)

10 (3;15)

N (new clue)

15

50 (15;60)

80 (65;90)

60 (50;85)

50 (50;60)

60 (50;87)

86 (50;90)

U (unchanged)

7

52 (5;55)

45 (5;50)

50 (5;52)

42 (5;50)

45 (40;50)

25 (5;38)

L (less likely, no new clues)

5

75 (15;100)

50 (15;80)

70 (15;100)

15 (12;50)

50 (15;50)

15 (12;50)

  1. Data represent median (quartiles) distances in mm on the analog scales of Rating 3 assessed after sputum analysis, whereby 0 indicates a negative and 100 a positive (affirmative) answer. To check the association of these general ratings with the changes in the rating regarding specific diagnoses, answers were further grouped (C, N, U, L) according to the comparison between Rating 1 (prior to sputum analysis) and Rating 2 (performed after having received the sputum result). The bold face type indicates the scores ≥ 80 in Rating 3.