Skip to main content

Primary endobronchial melanoma: a case report and clinical management indications

Abstract

Background

While cutaneous melanomas are well-documented, primary melanoma of the lung (PMML), particularly with endobronchial origin, remains rare and poorly characterized. This case report addresses gaps in understanding by presenting a comprehensive case of a 71-year-old male with primary endobronchial melanoma and conducting a systematic review of PMML cases.

Case Presentation

The patient, a former smoker, presented with dyspnea, cough, and hemoptysis. Imaging revealed left lung atelectasis and a suspicious nodule. Bronchoscopy identified an endobronchial mass, subsequently treated with argon plasma coagulation and resection. Biopsy confirmed melanoma. Extensive examinations ruled out a primary skin lesion. Despite initial treatment, recurrence led to pneumonectomy. Histopathology confirmed melanoma. The patient received treatment with pembrolizumab and ipilimumab, but with poor clinical benefit.

Conclusions

Primary endobronchial melanoma is a rare entity, comprising 0.01% of lung tumors. This case underscores diagnostic challenges and emphasizes histological criteria to distinguish primary from metastatic lesions. The pathogenesis remains unclear, with theories proposing foetal melanocyte migration or squamous metaplasia. Prognosis varies, necessitating radical surgical extirpation. A systematic review revealed diverse outcomes, supporting the need for further research. In conclusion, endobronchial melanoma involves an endoscopic and surgical management, but evolving therapies, such as immunotherapy, may reshape treatment paradigms. This case contributes to our understanding of PMML, guiding future research and clinical management. As therapeutic options evolve, continued research is crucial to refine our understanding and improve outcomes for this rare malignancy.

Peer Review reports

Background

Melanoma, primarily associated with the skin, is a malignancy originating from melanocytes [1]. Although it typically affects the tegumentary system, melanoma can also develop in various body locations [1]. The respiratory system, frequently affected by aggressive malignancies like non-small cell lung cancer and mesothelioma, rarely encounters primary melanoma within its tract [2].

Primary extrapulmonary tumours often metastasize to the lung parenchyma but infrequently to the airways [2]. By 2004, literature spanning four decades had only described 204 cases of endobronchial metastases [3]. Malignant melanoma accounts for 4.5% of these metastases from extra-thoracic primaries [2]. The scarcity of primary melanoma of the lung (PMML), particularly with endobronchial origin, is highlighted by the limited case studies and series available, leaving many of its aspects under-characterized.

The incidence, pathological features, clinical behaviour, and optimal treatment strategies for these melanomas remain unclear [4]. Some reported cases, managed decades ago with outdated methods, fail to reflect current diagnostic and therapeutic advancements. Notably, there has been a lack of recent systematic reviews synthesizing the knowledge on this rare malignancy, despite the existence of sporadic case reports.

In an effort to fill these knowledge gaps, we present a case of a 71-year-old man with primary endobronchial melanoma and perform a comprehensive review of the literature in PubMed. Our goal is to consolidate current information on endobronchial primary melanoma, offering a detailed perspective on its epidemiology, clinical presentation, histopathology, diagnostic challenges, and treatment options. This work seeks to enhance understanding of PMML and to inform future research and clinical practice.

Case presentation

A 71-year-old Caucasian male, a former smoker, presented with worsening dyspnoea and cough accompanied by occasional haemoptysis over a two-month period. He had no significant medical history. Radiographic assessment revealed complete atelectasis of the left upper lobe and partial atelectasis of the left lower lobe. A comprehensive diagnostic workup, including total body computed tomography (CT) and total body positron emission tomography (PET), showed a suspicious left lung nodule. A subsequent flexible bronchoscopy revealed complete stenosis of the left main bronchus caused by a highly vascularized, dark, polypoid endobronchial mass (Fig. 1). Emergency argon plasma coagulation and mechanical resection with a rigid bronchoscope were performed to restore airway patency. The primary aim of this initial treatment was to improve the patient’s performance status sufficiently for potential systemic therapy.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Initial flexible bronchoscopy identifying a complete stenosis of the left main bronchus, caused by a highly vascularized, dark, polypoid endobronchial mass

Histological examination of bronchial biopsies revealed necrosis and fragments of bronchial mucosa involved by a neoplastic proliferation of atypical epithelioid and spindle cells of medium size. These cells were characterized by eosinophilic cytoplasm and voluminous nuclei, often with prominent nucleoli. Immunohistochemistry confirmed the expression of pS100, Melan-A, and HMB-45 markers in the neoplastic cells, with no expression of keratins AE1/AE3. This led to the diagnosis melanoma (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Neoplastic cells exhibited characteristic features, including medium-sized atypical epithelioid and spindle cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm, voluminous nuclei, and prominent nucleoli (A-B). Expression of pS100, Melan-A, and HMB-45 markers confirmed the melanocytic origin, with the absence of keratins AE1/AE3, confirming the diagnostic hypothesis of melanoma (C-D)

The patient denied any history of skin lesion removal in the past. Extensive examinations of the skin, eyes, anorectal region, genitourinary tract, and oesophagus failed to reveal occult primary lesions. From September 2017 to April 2018, the patient underwent pembrolizumab therapy.

A CT scan conducted three months later showed a re-occlusion of the left main bronchus, leading to another session of argon plasma coagulation and mechanical resection with a rigid bronchoscope. A biopsy of the main bronchus in presumably healthy tissue was also performed, which yielded negative results for neoplastic cells. Subsequently, the patient underwent a pneumonectomy.

A left pneumonectomy was performed, with the entire specimen weighing 480 g. The upper lobe measured 10 × 8 × 7 cm, and the lower one measured 18 × 10 × 8 cm. Gross examination revealed a neoplastic mass in the hilar region of the left lung, measuring 7 × 5 × 8 cm, with a greyish-black appearance at the cut surface. The tumour encased the main bronchus, the upper lobe bronchus, and extended into the lung parenchyma, lymph nodes, and adipose tissue of the hilum (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Gross pathology of left lung melanoma: Panel A presents an overview of the resected mass from the left lung’s hilum. The tumour, measuring 7 × 5 × 8 cm, appears as a greyish-black mass with heterogeneous consistency (B-D). Panel B clearly shows the melanoma’s pigmentation and heterogeneity. In Panel C, the forceps lift a section to reveal the tumour’s depth and its infiltration into the lung tissue. Panel D emphasizes the extensive involvement of the tumour, with clear encasement of the main and upper lobe bronchi, as well as extension into the lung parenchyma, regional lymph nodes, and adipose tissue of the hilum. These images highlight the extent of disease progression and the complex surgical challenge presented by the tumour’s location and involvement of multiple structures

Microscopic examination revealed that the mass was composed of solid sheets of atypical epithelioid and spindle cells of medium size, with areas of necrosis and haemorrhage. Intracellular brown pigment, indicative of melanin, was observed. Immunohistochemistry confirmed the expression of pS100, Melan-A, and HMB-45 markers, with no expression of keratins AE1/AE3. This confirmed the diagnosis of localized melanoma. Notably, the resection margins were clear of neoplastic involvement.

The patient, discharged on postoperative day 9, commenced second-line therapy with ipilimumab.

However, despite this, his clinical condition deteriorated, and the patient passed away in July 2018.

Discussion

Primary endobronchial melanoma (PEBM), an uncommon variant of melanoma primarily localized to the bronchial region, constitutes about 0.01% of all lung tumours, highlighting its rarity, especially when of bronchial origin [5]. PEBM presents with a spectrum of symptoms, including cough, haemoptysis, and dyspnoea, which often mimic more common respiratory conditions. However, the most challenging aspect lies in differentiating primary bronchial melanoma from metastatic melanoma, given the peculiar ability of skin melanomas to spontaneously regress without residual traces of metastasis [6, 7].

Melanomas without an identifiable primary account for roughly 15% of cases, complicating diagnosis [1]. To address this issue, a set of histological criteria has been proposed to establish the diagnosis of primary malignant melanoma in the bronchus [8,9,10]. These criteria include histopathological features, the presence of a solitary lung tumor, the absence of a history of cutaneous, mucous membrane, or ocular melanoma, and the absence of any other detectable tumour at the time of diagnosis [8,9,10]. Our patient met all these criteria, strongly indicating PEBM.

The pathogenesis of PEBM remains unclear. Theories suggested that PEBM may arise from melanocytes that migrated during foetal development along the primitive respiratory tract from the pharynx to the oesophagus [11]. Alternatively, it may originate from areas of squamous metaplasia, where epithelial cells transdifferentiate into melanocytes [12,13,14]. The presence of melanocytes in the bronchopulmonary system is indeed unusual. Similar phenomena have been observed in the basal larynx of patients with chronic laryngitis, suggesting that irritated bronchi undergoing squamous metaplasia may harbour similar changes [15]. The rarity of melanocytes within the bronchopulmonary system and the phenomenon of squamous metaplasia in the bronchi under chronic inflammatory conditions hint at possible pathogenetic mechanisms.

PEBM’s primary nature is suggested by polypoid, intraluminal growth, in contrast to the disseminated pattern typical of metastases [16]. Nevertheless, the oncogenesis of primary endobronchial melanoma remains an intricate puzzle to solve. The scarcity of reported cases, along with the intriguing phenomenon of spontaneous regression in cutaneous melanomas, has hindered our understanding.

Prognosis is variable. While some patients present with advanced disease at diagnosis, leading to poor outcomes, others may achieve long-term survival following successful tumour resection [17]. As of the time of this report, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies, as well as radiotherapy, were unestablished treatment options for cutaneous melanoma as for PEBM.

To elucidate this rarity, we conducted a systematic review of the literature, with the following research strategy: ((“melanoma“[Title]) AND (“primary“[Title])) AND ((((“endobronchial“[Title]) OR (“bronchus“[Title])) OR (“pulmonary“[Title])) OR (“lung“[Title])). We extracted data on 27 patients with PEBM, from a total of 20 articles (Fig. 4). The data, summarized in Table 1 [5, 11, 12, 16, 18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33], spanned from 1963 to 2023, revealing a wide range of outcomes. Notably, 12 patients succumbed to the disease, with a median survival of 14 months (range 2–32 months), 4 were alive with the disease with a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 4–30), and 9 were without evidence of disease (NED) with a median follow-up of 15 months (range 7-108). Histopathological diagnoses were primarily based on positive S100 and HMB45 staining, with one case exhibiting a BRAF mutation.

Fig. 4
figure 4

PRISMA flow-chart summarizing the process for the identification of the eligible articles. A total of 27 case reports were extracted from the included 20 articles

Table 1 Summary of the included case reports of endobronchial melanoma

In conclusion, primary endobronchial melanoma remains a controversial entity, often necessitating an exclusion diagnosis. Like many malignant melanomas in other anatomical locations, radical surgical extirpation is considered mandatory, with or without regional lymph node dissection. Pneumonectomy with hilar lymph node dissection is often the treatment of choice, offering the best prospects for survival. However, with the advent of newer therapies, such as adjuvant (considering the PEBM a resectable metastasis of an unknown primary melanoma) or first-line (if the PEBM is unresectable) immunotherapy with nivolumab or the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab [34,35,36], the treatment landscape for primary melanoma of the lung may evolve.

Given the small number of cases and the perplexing phenomenon of spontaneous regression in cutaneous melanomas, further research and data accumulation are needed to refine our understanding of this peculiar malignancy. With the evolution of therapeutic options, the management of primary endobronchial melanoma may become more effective, offering hope for improved outcomes.

Data availability

The data supporting the results reported in this manuscript are available upon request. Due to privacy considerations, individual patient data cannot be publicly shared. Requests for data access should be directed to the Corresponding Author and will be subject to any necessary ethical and privacy approvals.

Abbreviations

CT:

Body computed tomography

PEBM:

primary endobronchial melanoma

PET:

total body positron emission tomography

PMML:

primary melanoma of the lung

References

  1. Long GV, Swetter SM, Menzies AM, Gershenwald JE, Scolyer RA. Cutaneous melanoma. Lancet. 2023;402:485–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00821-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Marchioni A, Lasagni A, Busca A, Cavazza A, Agostini L, Migaldi M, et al. Endobronchial metastasis: an epidemiologic and clinicopathologic study of 174 consecutive cases. Lung Cancer. 2014;84:222–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.03.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sørensen JB. Endobronchial metastases from extrapulmonary solid tumors. Acta Oncol. 2004;43:73–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860310018053.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. de Wilt JHW, Farmer SEJ, Scolyer RA, McCaughan BC, Thompson JF. Isolated melanoma in the lung where there is no known primary site: metastatic disease or primary lung tumour? Melanoma Res. 2005;15:531–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008390-200512000-00008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson RW, Moran CA. Primary melanoma of the lung: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of eight cases: the American. J Surg Pathol. 1997;21:1196–202. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-199710000-00010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith JL, Stehlin JS. Spontaneous regression of primary malignant melanomas with regional metastases. Cancer. 1965;18:1399–415. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(196511)18:11<1399::aid-cncr2820181104>3.0.co;2-r.

  7. Dasgupta TK, Brasfield RD, Paglia MA. Primary melanomas in unusua sites. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1969;128:841–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jansen YJL, Rozeman EA, Mason R, Goldinger SM, Geukes Foppen MH, Hoejberg L, et al. Discontinuation of anti-PD-1 antibody therapy in the absence of disease progression or treatment limiting toxicity: clinical outcomes in advanced melanoma. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:1154–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Allen MS, Drash EC. Primary melanoma of the lung. Cancer. 1968;21:154–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(196801)21:1<154::AID-CNCR2820210123>3.0.CO;2-K.

  10. Carstens PH, Kuhns JG, Ghazi C. Primary malignant melanomas of the lung and adrenal. Hum Pathol. 1984;15:910–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0046-8177(84)80119-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Farrell DJ, Kashyap AP, Ashcroft T, Morritt GN. Primary malignant melanoma of the bronchus. Thorax. 1996;51:223–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.51.2.223.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Taboada CF, McMurray JD, Jordan RA, Seybold WD. Primary melanoma of the lung. Chest. 1972;62:629–31. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.62.5.629.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Reid JD, Mehta VT. Melanoma of the lower respiratory tract. Cancer. 1966;19:627–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(196605)19:5<627::aid-cncr2820190505>3.0.co;2-y.

  14. Shivas AA, Maclennan WD. Melanogenic Metaplasia of mucous glands. Br J Cancer. 1963;17:411–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1963.57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Busuttil A. Dendritic pigmented cells within human laryngeal mucosa. Arch Otolaryngol. 1976;102:43–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1976.00780060089012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barzó P, Minik K, Tuka P, Kiss JI. The clinical significance of the primary malignant melanoma of the Lower Respiratory Tract and/or lung based on the analysis of published case reports and of two patients. Diagn Ther Endosc. 1995;1:169–75. https://doi.org/10.1155/DTE.1.169.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lie C-H, Chao T-Y, Chung Y-H, Lin M-C. Primary pulmonary malignant melanoma presenting with haemoptysis. Melanoma Res. 2005;15:219–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008390-200506000-00013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nigi A, Toyoshima H, Kondo S, Tanigawa M. Primary melanoma in the bronchus. Clin Case Rep. 2021;9:e05192. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.5192.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Bernal L, Restrepo J, Alarcón ML, Carvajal C, Bonilla CE, Ramírez AM, et al. Primary BRAF mutant melanoma of the lung treated with Immunotherapy and Pulmonary Bilobectomy: a Case Report. Am J Case Rep. 2021;22. https://doi.org/10.12659/AJCR.927757.

  20. Hwang K-B, Hwang K-E, Jung J-W, Oh S-J, Park M-J, Jeong Y-H, et al. Primary pulmonary malignant melanoma: an unexpected tumor. Tuberc Respir Dis. 2015;78:272. https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2015.78.3.272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamamoto Y, Kodama K, Maniwa T, Takeda M, Tanaka Y, Ozawa K, et al. Primary malignant melanoma of the lung: a case report. Mol Clin Oncol. 2017;7:39–41. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2017.1256.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kyriakopoulos C, Zarkavelis G, Andrianopoulou A, Papoudou-Bai A, Stefanou D, Boussios S, et al. Primary pulmonary malignant melanoma: report of an important entity and literature review. Case Rep Oncological Med. 2017;2017:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8654326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim BC, Kang HK, Kim YS, Haw S, Kim HS, Kang J. A rare case of endobronchial melanoma of unknown primary. Respiratory Med Case Rep. 2023;42:101811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmcr.2023.101811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mada PK, Garibay M, Graham RL. Primary Malignant Melanoma of the Lung (PMML); A Case Report. Cureus. 2023. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36850.

  25. Yabuki H, Kuwana K, Minowa M. Resection of primary malignant lung melanoma: a case report. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2018;26:710–2. https://doi.org/10.1177/0218492318811735.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang X, Wang Y, Du J. Primary malignant melanoma of left lower lobe of lung: a case report and review of the literature. Oncol Lett. 2015;10:528–30. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3196.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Azuma Y, Ono H, Kawabe K, Yanagimoto R, Suruda T, Minakata Y. Primary pulmonary melanoma diagnosed by semi-rigid thoracoscopy. Thorac Cancer. 2018;9:1528–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12867.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Lares Dos Santos C, Rodrigues Fernandes L, Meruje M, Barata F. Primary pulmonary melanoma: the unexpected tumour. Case Rep. 2013;2013:bcr2013200706–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-200706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Adebonojo SA, Grillo IA, Durodola JI. Primary malignant melanoma of the bronchus. J Natl Med Assoc. 1979;71:579–81.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Bagwell SP, Flynn SD, Cox PM, Davison JA. Primary malignant melanoma of the lung. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989;139:1543–7. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/139.6.1543.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Filosso PL, Donati G, Ruffini E, Croce S, Papotti M, Oliaro A, et al. Primary malignant melanoma of the bronchus intermedius. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:1215–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(03)00691-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dountsis A, Zisis C, Karagianni E, Dahabreh J. [No title found]. World J Surg Onc. 2003;1:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-1-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Salm R. A primary malignant melanoma of the bronchus. J Pathol. 1963;85:121–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1700850112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Weber J, Mandala M, Del Vecchio M, Gogas HJ, Arance AM, Cowey CL, et al. Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Ipilimumab in Resected Stage III or IV Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1824–35. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1709030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zimmer L, Livingstone E, Hassel JC, Fluck M, Eigentler T, Loquai C, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab monotherapy versus placebo in patients with resected stage IV melanoma with no evidence of disease (IMMUNED): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2020;395:1558–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30417-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob JJ, Cowey CL, Lao CD, et al. Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:23–34. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1504030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

University of Genova, Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneo (SBA) and Biblioteca della Scuola di Scienze Mediche e Farmaceutiche.

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EB and AB contributed equally. EB and ET: Conducted bronchoscopy, managed the interventional pneumological approach, and contributed to the conceptualization of the manuscript and providing endoscopy figures. MM: Performed histological examination and provided histological figures to the manuscript. FS, ETT, CG: management of the oncological aspects, providing crucial expertise for data understanding and interpretation. AB: Writing and Editing of the manuscript and management of the oncological aspects of the study. All authors actively engaged in validating the manuscript, ensuring the accuracy and coherence of the presented information. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Boutros.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable: Ethical approval for this case report was not requested. The presented case involves a retrospective analysis of clinical data and medical interventions performed as part of routine patient care. No experimental interventions or additional procedures beyond standard medical practice were conducted. The patient’s privacy and confidentiality have been strictly maintained in accordance with ethical guidelines. As such, formal ethical approval was deemed unnecessary for this retrospective case report. We are committed to adhering to ethical standards in medical research and patient care.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent were obtained from the patient for publication of this case report.

Competing interests

ETT reported Honoraria for Bristol Myers Squibb; MSD; Pierre Fabre. FS reported Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events: Novartis, MSD, BMS, Pierre Fabre, Merck, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, IGEA, Philogen. Consulting fees: Novartis, MSD, Sun Pharma, Pierre Fabre, Philogen. All the other authors declare that they have no competing interests. CG reported Honoraria for speaker activity or advisory boards from Astra Zeneca, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Eli Lilly, Merck-Sharp-Dohme, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barisione, E., Boutros, A., Mora, M. et al. Primary endobronchial melanoma: a case report and clinical management indications. BMC Pulm Med 24, 97 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-02904-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-02904-2

Keywords