Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
20 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
20 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Donald Arnold |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
20 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
7 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Brand |
17 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kenneth Chapman |
25 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Donald Arnold |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
25 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
1 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Donald Arnold |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
1 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
2 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Donald Arnold |
2 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Brand |
16 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kenneth Chapman |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
2 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
22 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Donald Arnold |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
22 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
25 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Donald Arnold |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
25 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
29 Mar 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
29 Mar 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2466-10-17 |
You can find further information about peer review here.