Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Random variation of inspiratory lung function parameters in patients with COPD: a diagnostic accuracy study

Original Submission
2 Sep 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ronald Halbert
1 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Steven Kesten
24 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Frank Visser
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Frank Visser
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Frank Visser
Resubmission - Version 4
1 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
17 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ronald Halbert
26 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Frank Visser
Resubmission - Version 5
26 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
6 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Neil Thomson
21 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Frank Visser
Resubmission - Version 8
21 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
Resubmission - Version 10
Submitted Manuscript version 10
12 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Frank Visser
Resubmission - Version 11
12 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 11
Publishing
14 May 2010 Editorially accepted
14 May 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2466-10-28

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page