Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
29 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
20 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kenneth Broadley |
19 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Malcolm Johnson |
21 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Hong Wei Chu |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
21 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
4 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Malcolm Johnson |
17 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kenneth Broadley |
6 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Hong Wei Chu |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
6 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
21 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Malcolm Johnson |
23 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Hong Wei Chu |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
23 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
11 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Hong Wei Chu |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
11 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
14 May 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
14 May 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2466-10-30 |
You can find further information about peer review here.