Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 15 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 26 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter LaPan |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 26 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 3 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ingel Demedts |
| 27 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Bruno |
| 1 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Reuven Rasooly |
| 27 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter LaPan |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 27 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 5 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Bruno |
| 12 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ingel Demedts |
| 28 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter LaPan |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 28 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 29 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter LaPan |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 29 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 2 Aug 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 2 Aug 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2466-10-40 |
You can find further information about peer review here.