Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
19 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
19 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Amy Scott-Thomas |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
19 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
30 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Craig Winstanley |
13 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Huw Williams |
23 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Douglas Curran-Everett |
23 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Amy Scott-Thomas |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
23 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
5 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Craig Winstanley |
26 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Amy Scott-Thomas |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
26 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
3 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Amy Scott-Thomas |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
3 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
4 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Amy Scott-Thomas |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
4 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
7 Nov 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
7 Nov 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2466-10-56 |
You can find further information about peer review here.