Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 19 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 19 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Amy Scott-Thomas |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 19 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 30 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Craig Winstanley |
| 13 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Huw Williams |
| 23 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Douglas Curran-Everett |
| 23 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Amy Scott-Thomas |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 23 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 5 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Craig Winstanley |
| 26 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Amy Scott-Thomas |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 26 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 3 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Amy Scott-Thomas |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 3 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 4 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Amy Scott-Thomas |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 4 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 7 Nov 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 7 Nov 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2466-10-56 |
You can find further information about peer review here.