Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
7 May 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
18 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Chapman |
2 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Chantal Raherison |
19 Sep 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Juan Guizar |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
19 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
30 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Chapman |
5 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Toni Monleón-Getino |
8 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Juan Guizar |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
8 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
23 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Chapman |
29 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Juan Guizar |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
29 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
2 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Francisco Gude |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
17 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Juan Guizar |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
17 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
24 Nov 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
24 Nov 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2466-10-62 |
You can find further information about peer review here.