Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Different screening strategies (single or dual) for the diagnosis of suspected latent tuberculosis: a cost effectiveness analysis

Original Submission
6 Nov 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kevin Schwartzman
4 Mar 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - laurent Nicod
23 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - Anil Pooran
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kevin Schwartzman
19 Nov 2009 Author responded Author comments - Anil Pooran
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Nov 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kevin Schwartzman
9 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Anil Pooran
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Anil Pooran
Resubmission - Version 5
5 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
22 Feb 2010 Editorially accepted
22 Feb 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2466-10-7

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page