Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
2 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
20 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Neuza Maria Alcantara-Neves |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
20 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
22 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip Bardin |
28 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bulent Enis Sekerel |
23 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Neuza Maria Alcantara-Neves |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
23 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
10 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip Bardin |
19 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bulent Enis Sekerel |
22 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Neuza Maria Alcantara-Neves |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
22 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
11 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Neuza Maria Alcantara-Neves |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
11 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
17 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Neuza Maria Alcantara-Neves |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
17 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
14 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
14 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2466-11-24 |
You can find further information about peer review here.