Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 30 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Demosthenes Bouros |
| 9 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Louise Ganderton |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 9 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 5 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vance Berger |
| 25 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Louise Ganderton |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 25 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 26 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Louise Ganderton |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 26 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 7 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vance Berger |
| 27 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Louise Ganderton |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 27 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 17 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Louise Ganderton |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 17 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 23 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 23 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2466-11-25 |
You can find further information about peer review here.