Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
30 May 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
30 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Don Sin |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
30 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
29 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nicole Hamblett |
22 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frank Accurso Accurso |
9 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Don Sin |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
9 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
15 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nicole Hamblett |
11 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frank Accurso Accurso |
25 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Don Sin |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
25 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
20 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Don Sin |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
20 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
14 Feb 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
14 Feb 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2466-12-3 |
You can find further information about peer review here.