Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
12 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
12 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Frank Buhling |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
12 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
2 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Chalmers |
4 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sachin Yende |
25 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Frank Buhling |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
25 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
3 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Frank Buhling |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
3 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
5 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Chalmers |
6 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sachin Yende |
17 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Frank Buhling |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
17 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
17 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Frank Buhling |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
17 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
20 Feb 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
20 Feb 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2466-12-6 |
You can find further information about peer review here.