Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
10 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
7 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eric Duiverman |
12 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gabriele Nicolini |
27 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Nathan |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
27 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
3 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Nathan |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
3 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
3 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Nathan |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
3 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
3 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Nathan |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
3 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
4 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gabriele Nicolini |
2 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eric Duiverman |
19 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Nathan |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
19 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
21 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Nathan |
1 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gabriele Nicolini |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
21 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
11 Oct 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
18 Oct 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2466-12-67 |
You can find further information about peer review here.