Author (Publication year) | Country/perspective (Pharma sponsored?) | Treatment line | Treatment | Incremental costs | LYG gained | QALY’s gained | ICER (per LYG) | ICER (per QALY) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  | In US-$ |  |  | In US-$ | In US-$ |
 |  |  | Erlotinib vs. BSC/chemotherapy |  |  |  |  |  |
Wang et al. (2013) [16] | China/health care system (no) | First | Erlotinib vs. carboplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy | $ 48,119*** | 0.84 | 0.58 | $ 30,455 | $ 85,927 |
Vergnenegre et al. (2012) [13] | France/payer (yes) | First maintenance | Erlotinib plus BSC vs. BSC | 11,140 € ($ 15,476*) | 0.28 |  | 39,783 € ($ 55,266*) |  |
Germany/payer (yes) | 13,141 € ($ 18,255*) | 0.28 |  | 46,931 € ($ 65,196*) |  | |||
 | Italy/payer (yes) |  |  | 7,808 € ($ 10,847*) | 0.28 |  | 27,885 € ($ 38,738*) |  |
Walleser et al. (2012) [14] | UK/payer (no) | First maintenance | Erlotinib vs. BSC | 7,898 € ($ 10,460*) | 0.39 |  | 20,711 € ($ 27,430*) |  |
Germany/payer (no) | 9,580 € ($ 12,688*) |  | 25,124 € ($ 33,275*) |  | ||||
France/payer (no) | 8,873 € ($ 11,752*) |  | 23,271 € ($ 30,821*) |  | ||||
Spain/payer (no) | 8,488 € ($ 11,242*) |  | 22,261 € ($ 29,483*) |  | ||||
 | Italy/payer (no) |  |  | 8,149 € ($ 10,793*) |  |  | 21,368 € ($ 28,300*) |  |
Klein et al. (2010) [15] | USA/payer (yes) | First maintenance | Erlotinib vs. pemetrexed | $ -24,474 | -0.1629 | Â | no statement | Â |
 |  |  | Erlotinib vs. BSC | $ 7,470 | 0.0982 |  | $ 76,069** |  |
Araújo et al. (2008) [17] | Portugal/health care system (yes) | Subsequent | Erlotinib vs. BSC | 10,366 € ($ 15,184) | 0.15 | 0.064 | 70,424 € ($ 103,159) | 161,742 € ($ 236,924) |
Erlotinib vs. docetaxel | -2,784 € ($ -4,078) | 0 | 0.025 | Dominant | Dominant | |||
 |  |  | Erlotinib vs. pemetrexed | -6,284 € ($ -9,205) | 0 | 0.009 | Dominant | Dominant |
Carlson et al. (2008) [12] | USA/payer (yes) | Subsequent | Erlotinib vs. docetaxel | $ -2,127 | Â | 0.01 | Â | Dominant |
 |  |  | Erlotinib vs. pemetrexed | $ -6,782 |  | 0.01 |  | Dominant |
Lewis et al. (2010) [18] | UK/NHS (yes) | Subsequent (second) | Erlotinib vs. docetaxel | £ -226 ($ -352) |  | 0.032 |  | Dominant |
Thongprasert et al. (2012) [19] | Thailand/payer (yes) | Subsequent | Erlotinib vs. docetaxel | $ 1,746 | Â | 0.0140 | Â | $ 124,703 |
Cromwell et al. (2011) [20] | Canada/health care system (no) | Subsequent | Erlotinib vs. docetaxel | 2,891 CAD ($ 2,529) | 0.003 | Â | Not calculated, no statistical differences | Â |
Cromwell et al. (2012) [21] | Canada/health care system (no) | Subsequent | Erlotinib vs. BSC | 11,102 CAD ($ 9,712) | 0.25 | Â | 36,838 CAD ($ 32,226) | Â |
Bradbury et al. (2010) [22] | Canada/health care system (no) | Subsequent | Erlotinib vs. BSC | 12,303 CAD ($ 11,454) | 0.13 | Â | 94,638 CAD ($ 88,109) | Â |
 |  |  | Gefitinib vs. chemotherapy |  |  |  |  |  |
Zhu et al. (2013) [23] | China/health care system (no) | First | Gefitinib (WT patients only) vs. routine care | $ 26,150 | 0.74 | 0.46 | $ 35,337 | $ 57,066 |
Thongprasert et al. (2012) [19] | Thailand/payer (yes) | Subsequent | Gefitinib vs. docetaxel | $ -247 | / | 0.0140 | / | Dominant |
 |  |  | Erlotinib (various combinations) |  |  |  |  |  |
Chouaid et al. (2012) [24] | France/payer (yes) | First | Erlotinib followed by docetaxel and gemcitabine (DG) vs. DG followed by erlotinib (fit elderly patients) | 3,954 € ($ 5,497) | / | -0.01 | / | 395,400 € ($ 549,700) |
Chouaid et al. (2013) [25] | France/payer (yes) | First | Erlotinib followed by gemcitabine vs. gemcitabine followed by erlotinib (frail elderly patients) | 130€ ($ 181) | / | -0.02 | / | / |
Carlson et al. (2009) [26] | USA/societal (no) | Subsequent | EGFR protein expression test (erlotinib if high expression/docetaxel if low expression) vs. No testing (erlotinib monotherapy) | $ 6,274 | / | 0.04 | / | $ 179,612 |
 |  |  | EGFR gene copy number test (erlotinib if high number/docetaxel if low number) vs. No testing (erlotinib monotherapy) | $ 9,209 | 0.12 | 0.06 | $ 78,367 | $ 162,018 |
 |  |  | Bevacizumab (plus chemotherapy) vs. chemotherapy |  |  |  |  |  |
Giuliani et al. (2010) [27] | Italy/payer (yes) | First | Bevacizumab plus cisplatin and gemcitabine vs. pemetrexed plus cisplatin | 4,007 € ($ 5,566) | 0.12 |  | 34,919 € ($ 48,509) |  |
Ahn et al. (2011) [28] | Korea/payer (yes) | First | Bevacizumab plus cisplatin and gemcitabine vs. cisplatin plus pemetrexed | $ 33,322 | 1.10 | Â | $ 30,318 | Â |
 | Taiwan/payer (yes) | First | Bevacizumab plus cisplatin and gemcitabine vs. cisplatin plus pemetrexed | $ 64,541 | 1.19 |  | $ 54,317 |  |
Goulart et al. (2011) [29] | USA/payer (no) | First | Bevacizumab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel vs. carboplatin-paclitaxel | $ 71,620 | 0.23 | 0.13 | $ 308,982 | $ 559,610 |
Klein et al. (2009) [30] | USA/payer (yes) | First | Carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab vs. cisplatin/pemetrexed | $ 24,528 | 0.0727 | 0.0244 | $ 337,179 | $ 1,006,065 |
Klein et al. (2010) [15] | USA/payer (yes) | First | Bevacizumab vs. pemetrexed | $ 9,187 | -0.0480 | Â | Dominated | Â |