Skip to main content

Table 5 Diagnostic yield of different combinations of sampling techniques

From: Predictors of diagnostic yield in bronchoscopy: a retrospective cohort study comparing different combinations of sampling techniques

 

The result of the first two sampling techniques in the combination

The result of all sampling techniques performed

The result of the first sampling technique (1)

The result of the second sampling technique (2)

 

DY (%)

DY (%)

p

DY (%)

p

DY (%)

p

Non-visible lesion/compression or constriction:

Biopsy(1) and TBNA(2)

26/48 (54.2)

27/48 (56.3)

NS

20/48 (41.7)

0.03

16/48 (33.3)

0.002

Biopsy(1) and Brushing(2)

18/42 (42.9)

20/42 (47.6)

NS

14/42 (33.3)

NS

9/42 (21.4)

0.004

TBNA(1) and Brushing(2)

16/51 (31.4)

21/51 (41.2)

0.06

11/51 (21.6)

0.06

10/51 (19.6)

0.03

Endobronchial visible lesion:

Biopsy(1) and TBNA(2)

72/86 (83.7)

73/86 (84.9)

NS

65/86 (75.6)

0.02

50/86 (58.1)

< 0.001

Biopsy(1) and Brushing(2)

37/46 (80.4)

39/46 (84.8)

NS

34/46 (73.9)

NS

23/46 (50.0)

< 0.001

TBNA(1) and Brushing(2)

30/47 (63.8)

39/47 (83.0)

0.004

27/47 (57.4)

NS

22/47 (46.8)

0.008

  1. Data are presented as number of positive samples/all samples (%). Statistical analysis: McNemar's test. DY = Diagnostic Yield. All results are compared with the diagnostic yield of the respective combination of the two sampling techniques.