Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of randomised controlled trials included in the meta-analysis

From: Comparing new treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis – a network meta-analysis

Source

No. of participants (Intervention)

Duration treatment, wk

Age, Mean

Male %

Time since diagnosis, yr

FVC, %, mean

Risk of biasa

Noble et al. 2011 [4] (Capacity 06)

171 (Pirfenidone 2403 mg/day)

72

67

72

≤1 yr: 59%

74

Low

 

173 (Placebo)

      

Noble et al. 2011 [4] (Capacity 04)

174 (Pirfenidone 2403 mg/day)

72

66

71

≤1 yr: 48%

75

Low

 

174 (Placebo)

      

Taniguchi et al. 2010 [5]

108 (Pirfenidone 1800 mg/day)

52

65

78

<1 yr: 37%

78

Unclear

 

104 (Placebo)

      

Azuma et al. 2005 [6]

73 (Pirfenidone 1800 mg/day)

39

64

90

<1 yr: 22%

80

Unclear

 

36 (Placebo)

      

King et al. 2014 [7] (Ascend)

278 (Pirfenidone 2403 mg/day)

52

68

78

1.7

68

Low

 

277 (Placebo)

      

Richeldi et al. 2011 [25]

85 (Nintedanib 300 mg/day)

52

65

75

1.2

80

Low

 

85 (Placebo)

      

Richeldi et al. 2014 [8] (INPULSIS-1)

309 (Nintedanib 300 mg/day)

52

67

81

1.7

80

Low

 

204 (Placebo)

      

Richeldi et al. 2014 [8] (INPULSIS-2)

329 (Nintedanib 300 mg/day)

52

67

78

1.6

79

Low

 

219 (Placebo)

      

Homma et al. 2012 [24],

38 (Inhaled NAC)

48

68

76

3

89

Unclear

 

38 (Placebo)

      

Raghu et al. 2012 [22], (PANTHER)

77 (NAC triple therapy)

32

68

75

1.1

71

Low

 

78 (Placebo)

      

IPFCRN, 2014 [23] (PANTHER)

133 (NAC)

60

68

78

1.1

73

Low

 

131 (Placebo)

      
  1. aRisk of selection bias.