Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Validity and reliability of fluoroscopy for digital radiography: a new way to evaluate diaphragmatic mobility

Original Submission
11 Apr 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
6 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nicola Sverzellati
12 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Javier Diaz-Mendoza
13 Jun 2016 Author responded Author comments - MÁRCIA GONÇALVES
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Jun 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Javier Diaz-Mendoza
16 Sep 2016 Author responded Author comments - MÁRCIA GONÇALVES
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Sep 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - MÁRCIA GONÇALVES
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - MÁRCIA GONÇALVES
Resubmission - Version 5
9 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 5
23 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - MÁRCIA GONÇALVES
Resubmission - Version 6
23 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
28 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
17 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12890-017-0402-x

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page