| Study Design | Objective | Target Population/Eligibility Requirements | Intervention; Delivery Method | Outcomes Measured | Follow- Up | Comparison Group Treatment | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lopez 2017 (n = 370) | Non-randomized controlled quasi-experiment | To assess feasibility and effectiveness of CHW and health advocate initiative in public housing residents with high chronic disease burden | Low income, adults with either asthma (37.7%), hypertension, or diabetes recruited from 5 East Harlem public housing developments | 6 or more CHW visits as well as referrals to health advocates as needed; CHW and community based health advocate | BP, BMI, self reported physical activity, mental health status, self-efficacy, QOL, healthcare access, disease management | 3 months | Health advocate support alone | Improvement in self-reported physical activity (p = 0.005), change in insurance (11% vs 4%; p = 0.009), and change in primary doctor (14% vs 6%; p = 0.024); no between group difference in asthma self efficacy or general mental health |
Krieger 2014 (n = 366) | Randomized controlled trial | To assess whether CHW in home self-management support reduces asthma morbidity | Low-income adults with poorly controlled asthma primarily recruited from public health, community, and hospital-based clinics | 5 CHW home visits and as needed support via telephone, e-mail, or additional home visits, environmental trigger assessment and intervention; CHW | Asthma symptom free days, asthma related QOL, asthma-related unscheduled health care use; night symptoms, asthma exacerbations, medication use, pulmonary function, medication use, absenteeism, general health status | 12 months | Usual care plus community resource information and educational pamphlets | Increase in mean symptom free days per 2 weeks (2.02 d)(p < 0.001) and increase in asthma-related QOL (mean 0.50 points)(p < 0.001), fewer asthma attacks & night symptoms, improved asthma control and health status in intervention group; both had decreased urgent care use (1.3–1.5 fewer episodes)a; no change in PFT or absenteeism between groups |
Martin 2006 (n = 47) | Cross sectional and longitudinal analysis | To assess whether CHW home visits enabled changes in home asthma triggers | Inner-city, low-income, Latino adults with asthma recruited from community center | Initial visit for intervention followed by 3 home visits for data collection; CHW | ED and urgent care utilization, hospitalizations, asthma severity, albuterol use, home asthma triggers | 3, 6, and 12 months | NA | Decrease in home trigger score by 0.41(p < 0.01) with each home visit; no change in ED visit, urgent care visit, hospitalization at 3,6,12 m follow up; no change in daily albuterol use or asthma severity; improvement in individual home asthma triggers (chlorine, aerosols, use of air filter) at 12 m follow up |
Martin 2009 (n = 42) | Randomized pilot controlled trial | To assess whether CHW intervention improves asthma self-efficacy, clinical outcomes, and self-management behaviors | Low-income African American adults with asthma recruited from clinic | 4 group sessions led by a social worker at primary care clinics and 6 CHW in-home visits; CHW and social workers | Asthma self efficacy, asthma QOL, coping skills, self management behavior, use of steroids, symptoms | 3 and 6 months | Asthma education materials alone | Higher asthma self-efficacy at 3 months, improved asthma-related QOL and coping at 6 months; no change in use of inhaled steroids, number of symptomatic nights and days, use of a spacer, and asthma knowledge at 3 and 6 months |