Skip to main content

Table 3 Exploration of heterogeneity on the LDCT versus control for lung cancer mortality

From: Effects of low-dose computed tomography on lung cancer screening: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis

Category

No. of estimates

Pooled RR (95% CI)

Heterogeneity I2 (%)

Total

9

0.83* (0.76–0.90)

1

Subgroup analyses

 Type of control groups

  LDCT versus no screening

7

0.78* (0.68–0.89)

0

  LDCT versus CXR

2

0.94 (0.68–1.29)

47

 Quality of studies

  Moderate to high quality

7

0.82* (0.73–0.91)

7

  Low quality

2

0.87 (0.64–1.20)

23

 Sample size

  Smaller size (DANTE, DLCST, ITALUNG, LUSI, MILD, Yang 2018, LSS)

7

0.87 (0.73–1.04)

5

  Larger size (NELSON, NLST)

2

0.80* (0.71–0.91)

13

 Sex

  Male

2

0.76* (0.63–0.93)

0

  Female

2

0.52* (0.29–0.92)

13

Sensitivity analysis

 Exclusion of the studies from Asia and 5 years of follow up

  Exclude Yang 2018

8

0.83* (0.76–0.91)

1

 Exclusion of studies in random manner

  Exclude DANTE

8

0.82* (0.74–0.89)

0

  Exclude DLCST

8

0.82* (0.75–0.90)

1

  Exclude ITALUNG

8

0.83* (0.75–0.92)

5

  Exclude LUSI

8

0.83* (0.75–0.92)

8

  Exclude MILD

8

0.83 * (0.75–0.92)

8

  Exclude NELSON

8

0.86* (0.77–0.95)

0

  Exclude LSS

8

0.82* (0.75–0.89)

0

  Exclude NLST

8

0.81* (0.70–0.93)

7

  1. See Table 1 legends for abbreviations
  2. *Statistically significant differences