From: Home mechanical ventilation: quality of life patterns after six months of treatment
Author | Study aim | Patients | Main HRQL (SRI SS) finding for HMV patients | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Windisch et al. [13] | Studies reporting change in HRQL | HRQL improvement during HMV | 85 stable NIV patients | 49 ± 15 (baseline) 61 ± 15 (1 month) 61 ± 16 (1 year) |
Struik et al. [23] | NIV vs. standard treatment | 108 COPD patients after acute exacerbation | 47.9 ± 15.1 (baseline) 55.0 ± 15.4 (12 months) | |
Murphy et al. [24] | O2 therapy vs NIV + O2 therapy | 64 hypercapnic patients after acute exacerbation | 50.6 (6 weeks) | |
Howard et al. [25] | CPAP vs Bi-level PAP | 57 OHS patients (outpatient or hospital referral) | 50.63 ± 3.65 (baseline) 63.5 ± 3.74 (3 months) | |
Storre et al. [26] | AVAPS in OHS | 10 OHS patients starting NIV | 63 ± 15 (baseline) 78 ± 14 (6 weeks BPV-S/T) 76 ± 16 (6 weeks BPV-S/T-AVAPS) | |
Murphy [27] | Studies reporting HRQL for a specific HMV patient group | High intensity vs high pressure NIV | 7 COPD with established HMV | 57 ± 11 vs 69 ± 16 |
Storre et al. [28] | High intensity vs target volume NIV | 10 COPD patients with established HMV | 59.3 ± 14.8 vs 62.4 ± 18.9 | |
Arellano-Maric et al. [29] | NIV vs CPAP | 42 OHS patients with established NIV | 61.2 ± 16 vs 65.3 ± 14 | |
Windisch [30] | SRI validation in COPD | 162 COPD patients with established NIV | 52 ± 17 | |
Walterspracher [31] | SRI for LOT COPD patients | 42 COPD patients with established NIV | 53.2 ± 18.6 | |
Oga et al. [11] | HRQL tool comparisons | 56 COPD/TB patients with established NIV | 56.0 ± 15.3 | |
Chen et al. [18] | Chinese SRI validation | 149 stable NIV patients | 52.93 ± 15.11 | |
Budweiser [8] | Studies reporting HRQL for mixed HMV patient group | Prognostic value of HRQL | 231 stable IV and IV patients | 61.2 ± 17.7 (all patients) 52.2 ± 15.6 (COPD) 66.2 ± 17.2 (RCWD) 55.3 ± 9.2 (NMD) 71.3 ± 15.7 (OHS/OL) |
Gosh et al. [16] | English SRI validation | 152 stable NIV and IV patients | 55.9 ± 18.9 (all patients) 43.1 ± 17.3 (COPD) 61.9 ± 16.1 (RCWD) 58.8 ± 20.3 (NMD) 53.4 ± 18.8 (OHS) 53.5 ± 19.7 (miscellaneous) | |
Oga et al. [19] | Japanese SRI validation | 56 stable NIV patients | 56.0 ± 15.3 (all patients) 56.6 ± 14.7 (COPD) 55.5 ± 16.4 (Tb) | |
Ribeiro et al. [20] | Portuguese SRI validation | 93 stable NIV and IV patients | 56.6 ± 15.7 (all patients) 57.0 ± 16.5 (COPD) 55.6 ± 15.1 (OHS) 62.0 ± 12.6 (RCWD) 50.2 ± 16.2 (COPD+OSA) 59.4 ± 19.2 (NMD) 46.0 ± 13.3 (miscellaneous) | |
Markussen et al. [17] | Norwegian SRI validation | 127 stable NIV and IV patients | 55.8 ± 18.4 (all patients) 61.0 ± 14.7 (NMD) 43.2 ± 19.0 (COPD) 58.4 ± 18.3 (OHS) 55.8 ± 18.4 (RCWD) | |
Valko et al. [21] | Hungarian SRI validation | 104 stable NIV and IV patients | 66.8 ± 15.1 (NIV) 58.2 ± 13.6 (IV) | |
Huttmann et al. [32] | HRQL after unsuccessful weaning | 25 IV patients | 49 ± 16 (NMD) 47 ± 20 (COPD) | |
Huttmann et al. [14] | HRQL of invasively ventilated HMV patients | 32 IV patients | 53 ± 16 (all patients) 58 ± 16 (NMD) 48 ± 15 (lung diseases) | |
Raveling et al. [33] | Hypercapnia improvement as a survival predictor | 240 COPD patients starting NIV | 49.9 ± 15.0 (all patients) 54.6 ± 14.3 (stable patients) 47.9 ± 14.9 (patients after ARF) |