Skip to main content

Table 1 Studies utilizing SRI to report detailed HRQL for HMV patients

From: Home mechanical ventilation: quality of life patterns after six months of treatment

Author

Study aim

Patients

Main HRQL (SRI SS) finding for HMV patients

Windisch et al. [13]

Studies reporting change in HRQL

HRQL improvement during HMV

85 stable NIV patients

49 ± 15 (baseline)

61 ± 15 (1 month)

61 ± 16 (1 year)

Struik et al. [23]

NIV vs. standard treatment

108 COPD patients after acute exacerbation

47.9 ± 15.1 (baseline)

55.0 ± 15.4 (12 months)

Murphy et al. [24]

O2 therapy vs NIV + O2 therapy

64 hypercapnic patients after acute exacerbation

50.6 (6 weeks)

Howard et al. [25]

CPAP vs Bi-level PAP

57 OHS patients (outpatient or hospital referral)

50.63 ± 3.65 (baseline)

63.5 ± 3.74 (3 months)

Storre et al. [26]

AVAPS in OHS

10 OHS patients starting NIV

63 ± 15 (baseline)

78 ± 14 (6 weeks BPV-S/T)

76 ± 16 (6 weeks BPV-S/T-AVAPS)

Murphy [27]

Studies reporting HRQL for a specific HMV patient group

High intensity vs high pressure NIV

7 COPD with established HMV

57 ± 11 vs 69 ± 16

Storre et al. [28]

High intensity vs target volume NIV

10 COPD patients with established HMV

59.3 ± 14.8 vs 62.4 ± 18.9

Arellano-Maric et al. [29]

NIV vs CPAP

42 OHS patients with established NIV

61.2 ± 16 vs 65.3 ± 14

Windisch [30]

SRI validation in COPD

162 COPD patients with established NIV

52 ± 17

Walterspracher [31]

SRI for LOT COPD patients

42 COPD patients with established NIV

53.2 ± 18.6

Oga et al. [11]

HRQL tool comparisons

56 COPD/TB patients with established NIV

56.0 ± 15.3

Chen et al. [18]

Chinese SRI validation

149 stable NIV patients

52.93 ± 15.11

Budweiser [8]

Studies reporting HRQL for mixed HMV patient group

Prognostic value of HRQL

231 stable IV and IV patients

61.2 ± 17.7 (all patients)

52.2 ± 15.6 (COPD)

66.2 ± 17.2 (RCWD)

55.3 ± 9.2 (NMD)

71.3 ± 15.7 (OHS/OL)

Gosh et al. [16]

English SRI validation

152 stable NIV and IV patients

55.9 ± 18.9 (all patients)

43.1 ± 17.3 (COPD)

61.9 ± 16.1 (RCWD)

58.8 ± 20.3 (NMD)

53.4 ± 18.8 (OHS)

53.5 ± 19.7 (miscellaneous)

Oga et al. [19]

Japanese SRI validation

56 stable NIV patients

56.0 ± 15.3 (all patients)

56.6 ± 14.7 (COPD)

55.5 ± 16.4 (Tb)

Ribeiro et al. [20]

Portuguese SRI validation

93 stable NIV and IV patients

56.6 ± 15.7 (all patients)

57.0 ± 16.5 (COPD)

55.6 ± 15.1 (OHS)

62.0 ± 12.6 (RCWD)

50.2 ± 16.2 (COPD+OSA)

59.4 ± 19.2 (NMD)

46.0 ± 13.3 (miscellaneous)

Markussen et al. [17]

Norwegian SRI validation

127 stable NIV and IV patients

55.8 ± 18.4 (all patients)

61.0 ± 14.7 (NMD)

43.2 ± 19.0 (COPD)

58.4 ± 18.3 (OHS)

55.8 ± 18.4 (RCWD)

Valko et al. [21]

Hungarian SRI validation

104 stable NIV and IV patients

66.8 ± 15.1 (NIV)

58.2 ± 13.6 (IV)

Huttmann et al. [32]

HRQL after unsuccessful weaning

25 IV patients

49 ± 16 (NMD)

47 ± 20 (COPD)

Huttmann et al. [14]

HRQL of invasively ventilated HMV patients

32 IV patients

53 ± 16 (all patients)

58 ± 16 (NMD)

48 ± 15 (lung diseases)

Raveling et al. [33]

Hypercapnia improvement as a survival predictor

240 COPD patients starting NIV

49.9 ± 15.0 (all patients)

54.6 ± 14.3 (stable patients)

47.9 ± 14.9 (patients after ARF)

  1. Data are presented as mean (SD)
  2. NIV noninvasive ventilation, IV invasive ventilation, HRQL health related quality of life, HMV home mechanical ventilation, SRI SS Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Questionnaire Summary Score, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, TB tuberculosis sequelae, OHS obesity hypoventilation syndrome, OL overlap syndrome, NMD neuromuscular disease, RCDW restrictive chest wall disease, BPV-S/T bilevel pressure ventilation -spontaneous/timed, AVAPS average volume assured pressure support