Skip to main content

Table 3 Literature review—randomized controlled trials who evaluated dexmedetomidine sedation in flexible bronchoscopy procedures

From: Dexmedetomidine versus propofol sedation in flexible bronchoscopy: a randomized controlled trial

References

Design

Procedure

Intervention (n)

Comparator (n)

DEX dose

Primary outcome

Ryu et al. [16]

RCT

FB

PRF– DEX (36)

PRF –rFEN (36)

0.4–2 μg/kg /H

SpO2

Liao et al. [27]

RCT

FB

DEX (99)

MDZ (99)

0.5 μg/kg /H

SpO2

Goneppanavar 201526

RCT

FB

DEX (27)

MDZ (27)

1 μg/kg once

Othera

Yuan et al. [18]

RCT

FB

DEX-FEN (50)

PRF-FEN (50)

0.2–0.7 μg/kg /H

SpO2

Riachy et al. [25]

RCT

FB

LID + DEX (53)

LID (54) ID + FEN (55)

0.5 μg/kg once

Other b

Li et al. [24]

RCT

FB

DEX + FEN + PRF (57)

FEN + PRF (57)

0.5–1 mg/kg once

SpO2

St-Pierre et al. [20]

RCT

EBUS-TBNA

DEX (30)

rFEN (30)

0.5–1.0 μg/kg /H

SpO2

Magazine et al. [23]

RCT

FB

DEX (27)

MDZ (27)

0.5 μg/kg once

Other a

Lin et al. [19]

RCT

EBUS-TBNA

DEX (25)

PRF (25)

0.5–1.4 μg/kg /H

SpO2

Kim et al. [22]

RCT

EBUS-TBNA

DEX (48)

MDZ (54)

0.25–0.75 μg/kg /H

SpO2

Kumari et al. [21]

RCT

EBUS-TBNA

DEX (99)

MDZ (98)

0.6 μg/kg /H

Other c

Zhang et al. [17]

RCT

FB

DEX (222)

FEN (211)

1 μg/kg once

SpO2

Pertzov 2021 (current study)

RCT

FB

DEX (30)

PRF (33)

0.5 μg kg /H

SpO2

  1. FB – flexible bronchoscopy; CS – Conscious sedation; GA – general anesthesia; MDS – Moderate to deep sedation; DEX – dexmedetomidine; PRF – propofol; MDZ – midazolam; FEN – fentanyl; rFEN – remifentanil; LID – lidocaine; EBUS-TBNA– endobronchial ultrasound ‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration
  2. aComposite outcome: sedation, cough, calmness, respiratory response, physical movement, facial tension
  3. bProcedure tolerance, sedation level, safety
  4. cNumber of rescue midazolam boluses