Table 3 In both patient groups, PGD grades were dichotomized and analyzed into two categories according to their clinical relevance (PGD grade 0 – 1 vs PGD grade 2 – 3). Data are presented as n (%)
Time 0 | |||
PGD grade | non-POC | POC | p-value |
0—1 | 22 (61.1) | 24 (77.4) | 0.19 |
2—3 | 14 (38.9) | 7 (22.6) | |
Time 24 | |||
PGD grade | non-POC | POC | p-value |
0—1 | 28 (77.8) | 28 (90.3) | 0.2 |
2—3 | 8 (22.2) | 3 (9.7) | |
Time 48 | |||
PGD grade | non-POC | POC | p-value |
0—1 | 27 (75) | 26 (83.9) | 0.55 |
2—3 | 9 (25) | 5 (16.1) | |
Time 72 | |||
PGD grade | non-POC | POC | p-value |
0—1 | 27 (75) | 30 (96.8) | 0.016 |
2—3 | 9 (25) | 1 (3.2) | |