Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparison of different reference values for lung function: implications of inconsistent use among centers

Original Submission
16 Dec 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
26 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
11 Mar 2023 Author responded Author comments - Henrik Mangseth
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Mar 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Mar 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
27 Mar 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
4 Apr 2023 Author responded Author comments - Henrik Mangseth
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Apr 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
11 Apr 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
12 Apr 2023 Editorially accepted
24 Apr 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12890-023-02430-7

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page